Suppr超能文献

相似和不相似干扰物所诱发的视觉拥挤中的替换与合并

Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

作者信息

Ester Edward F, Zilber Emma, Serences John T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2015 Jan 8;15(1):15.1.4. doi: 10.1167/15.1.4.

Abstract

Visual crowding refers to a phenomenon whereby objects that appear in the periphery of the visual field are more difficult to identify when embedded within clutter. Pooling models assert that crowding results from an obligatory averaging or other combination of target and distractor features that occurs prior to awareness. One well-known manifestation of pooling is feature averaging, with which the features of target and nontarget stimuli are combined at an early stage of visual processing. Conversely, substitution models assert that crowding results from binding a target and nearby distractors to incorrect spatial locations. Recent evidence suggests that substitution predominates when target-flanker feature similarity is low, but it is unclear whether averaging or substitution best explains crowding when similarity is high. Here, we examined participants' orientation report errors for targets crowded by similar or dissimilar flankers. In two experiments, we found evidence inconsistent with feature averaging regardless of target-flanker similarity. However, the observed data could be accommodated by a probabilistic substitution model in which participants occasionally "swap" a target for a distractor. Thus, we conclude that-at least for the displays used here-crowding likely results from a probabilistic substitution of targets and distractors, regardless of target-distractor feature similarity.

摘要

视觉拥挤是指一种现象,即在视野边缘出现的物体,当嵌入杂乱背景中时更难识别。合并模型认为,拥挤是由于在意识之前发生的目标和干扰物特征的强制性平均或其他组合所致。合并的一个著名表现是特征平均,即目标和非目标刺激的特征在视觉处理的早期阶段进行组合。相反,替代模型认为,拥挤是由于将目标和附近的干扰物绑定到错误的空间位置所致。最近的证据表明,当目标-侧翼特征相似度较低时,替代占主导地位,但当相似度较高时,平均还是替代最能解释拥挤现象尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了参与者对被相似或不相似侧翼拥挤的目标的方向报告误差。在两个实验中,我们发现无论目标-侧翼相似度如何,证据都与特征平均不一致。然而,观察到的数据可以由一个概率替代模型来解释,在该模型中,参与者偶尔会将目标与干扰物“交换”。因此,我们得出结论,至少对于这里使用的显示来说,拥挤可能是由于目标和干扰物的概率替代,而与目标-干扰物特征相似度无关。

相似文献

2
Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):1022-33. doi: 10.1037/a0035377. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
3
Substitution and pooling in crowding.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Feb;74(2):379-96. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0229-0.
4
Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13130-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901352106. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
5
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Oct;26(10):2298-309. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00649. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
6
Crowding follows the binding of relative position and orientation.
J Vis. 2012 Mar 21;12(3):10.1167/12.3.18 18. doi: 10.1167/12.3.18.
8
A crowdful of letters: disentangling the role of similarity, eccentricity and spatial frequencies in letter crowding.
Vision Res. 2014 Apr;97:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
9
Crowding with conjunctions of simple features.
J Vis. 2007 Nov 20;7(2):23.1-12. doi: 10.1167/7.2.23.
10
A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search.
J Vis. 2012 Apr 20;12(4):10.1167/12.4.14 14. doi: 10.1167/12.4.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Color crowding considered as adaptive spatial integration.
J Vis. 2024 Dec 2;24(13):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.13.9.
2
A computational approach to the N-back task.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80537-5.
3
Spatial context non-uniformly modulates inter-laminar information flow in the primary visual cortex.
Neuron. 2024 Dec 18;112(24):4081-4095.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.021. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
4
When periphery rules: Enhanced sampling weights of the visual periphery in crowding across dimensions.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):779-790. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02580-7. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Neural Correlates of Crowding in Macaque Area V4.
J Neurosci. 2024 Jun 12;44(24):e2260232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2260-23.2024.
8
The impact of training on the inner-outer asymmetry in crowding.
J Vis. 2023 Aug 1;23(8):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.8.3.
10
Feature representation under crowding in macaque V1 and V4 neuronal populations.
Curr Biol. 2022 Dec 5;32(23):5126-5137.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.10.049. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Oct;26(10):2298-309. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00649. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
2
Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):1022-33. doi: 10.1037/a0035377. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
3
Source confusion is a major cause of crowding.
J Vis. 2013 Jan 18;13(1):24. doi: 10.1167/13.1.24.
4
Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8780-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117465109. Epub 2012 May 11.
5
Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review.
J Vis. 2011 Dec 1;11(5):13. doi: 10.1167/11.5.13.
6
Metamers of the ventral stream.
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Aug 14;14(9):1195-201. doi: 10.1038/nn.2889.
9
A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for feature integration explains visual crowding.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jan 22;6(1):e1000646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000646.
10
A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding.
J Vis. 2009 Nov 19;9(12):13.1-18. doi: 10.1167/9.12.13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验