Suppr超能文献

用于分子电荷转移的电子耦合:将含时密度泛函理论(CDFT)、含时泛函密度泛函理论(FODFT)和含时泛函密度泛函紧束缚方法(FODFTB)与高水平从头算计算进行基准测试。II.

Electronic couplings for molecular charge transfer: benchmarking CDFT, FODFT and FODFTB against high-level ab initio calculations. II.

作者信息

Kubas Adam, Gajdos Fruzsina, Heck Alexander, Oberhofer Harald, Elstner Marcus, Blumberger Jochen

机构信息

University College London, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015 Jun 14;17(22):14342-54. doi: 10.1039/c4cp04749d.

Abstract

A new database (HAB7-) of electronic coupling matrix elements (Hab) for electron transfer in seven medium-sized negatively charged π-conjugated organic dimers is introduced. Reference data are obtained with spin-component scaled approximate coupled cluster method (SCS-CC2) and large basis sets. Assessed DFT-based approaches include constrained density functional theory (CDFT), fragment-orbital DFT (FODFT), self-consistent charge density functional tight-binding (FODFTB) and the recently described analytic overlap method (AOM). This complements the previously reported HAB11 database where only cationic dimers were considered. The CDFT method in combination with a functional based on PBE and including 50% of exact exchange (HFX) was found to provide best estimates, with a mean relative unsigned error (MRUE) of 8.2%. CDFT couplings systematically increase with decreasing fraction of HFX as a consequence of increasing delocalisation of the SOMO orbital. The FODFT method is found to be very robust underestimating electronic couplings by 28%. The FODFTB and AOM methods, although orders of magnitude more efficient in terms of computational effort than the DFT approaches, perform well with reasonably small errors of 54% and 29%, respectively, translating in errors in the non-adiabatic electron transfer rate of a factor of 2.4 and 1.7, respectively. We discuss carefully various sources of errors and the scope and limitations of all assessed methods taking into account the results obtained for both HAB7- and HAB11 databases.

摘要

介绍了一个新的数据库(HAB7-),该数据库包含七个中等大小带负电荷的π共轭有机二聚体中电子转移的电子耦合矩阵元素(Hab)。参考数据通过自旋分量缩放近似耦合簇方法(SCS-CC2)和大基组获得。基于密度泛函理论(DFT)的评估方法包括约束密度泛函理论(CDFT)、片段轨道DFT(FODFT)、自洽电荷密度泛函紧束缚(FODFTB)以及最近描述的解析重叠方法(AOM)。这补充了先前报道的HAB11数据库,该数据库仅考虑了阳离子二聚体。发现CDFT方法与基于PBE并包含50%精确交换的泛函(HFX)相结合时能提供最佳估计,平均相对无符号误差(MRUE)为8.2%。由于SOMO轨道离域化增加,CDFT耦合随着HFX分数的降低而系统地增加。发现FODFT方法非常稳健,将电子耦合低估了28%。FODFTB和AOM方法虽然在计算量方面比DFT方法效率高几个数量级,但表现良好,误差分别为54%和29%,分别转化为非绝热电子转移速率的误差为2.4倍和1.7倍。我们结合HAB7-和HAB11数据库获得的结果,仔细讨论了各种误差来源以及所有评估方法的范围和局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验