Casas Jessica, Friedman David F, Jackson Tannoa, Vege Sunitha, Westhoff Connie M, Chou Stella T
Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Transfusion. 2015 Jun;55(6 Pt 2):1388-93. doi: 10.1111/trf.12987. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
Extended red blood cell (RBC) antigen matching is recommended to limit alloimmunization in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). DNA-based testing to predict blood group phenotypes has enhanced availability of antigen-negative donor units and improved typing of transfused patients, but replacement of routine serologic typing for non-ABO antigens with molecular typing for patients has not been reported.
This study compared the historical RBC antigen phenotypes obtained by hemagglutination methods with genotype predictions in 494 patients with SCD. For discrepant results, repeat serologic testing was performed and/or investigated by gene sequencing for silent or variant alleles.
Seventy-one typing discrepancies were identified among 6360 antigen comparisons (1.1%). New specimens for repeat serologic testing were obtained for 66 discrepancies and retyping agreed with the genotype in 64 cases. One repeat Jk(b-) serologic phenotype, predicted Jk(b+) by genotype, was found by direct sequencing of JK to be a silenced allele, and one N typing discrepancy remains under investigation. Fifteen false-negative serologic results were associated with alleles encoding weak antigens or single-dose Fy(b) expression.
DNA-based RBC typing provided improved accuracy and expanded information on RBC antigens compared to hemagglutination methods, leading to its implementation as the primary method for extended RBC typing for patients with SCD at our institution.
推荐进行扩展红细胞(RBC)抗原匹配以限制镰状细胞病(SCD)患者的同种免疫。基于DNA的检测来预测血型表型提高了抗原阴性供体单位的可及性,并改善了输血患者的血型鉴定,但尚未有报道用分子分型替代患者非ABO抗原的常规血清学分型。
本研究比较了494例SCD患者通过血凝方法获得的既往RBC抗原表型与基因型预测结果。对于结果不一致的情况,进行重复血清学检测和/或通过基因测序研究沉默或变异等位基因。
在6360次抗原比较中发现71例分型不一致(1.1%)。对66例不一致情况获取了重复血清学检测的新标本,64例重新分型结果与基因型一致。通过JK直接测序发现1例重复的Jk(b-)血清学表型(基因型预测为Jk(b+))是一个沉默等位基因,1例N分型不一致仍在研究中。15例假阴性血清学结果与编码弱抗原的等位基因或单剂量Fy(b)表达相关。
与血凝方法相比,基于DNA的RBC分型提供了更高的准确性和关于RBC抗原的更多信息,因此在我们机构将其作为SCD患者扩展RBC分型的主要方法实施。