Wolf Julia, Blais-Normandin Isabelle, Bathla Aarti, Keshavarz Homa, Chou Stella T, Al-Riyami Arwa Z, Josephson Cassandra D, Massey Edwin, Hume Heather A, Pendergrast Jacob, Denomme Gregory, Grubovic Rastvorceva Rada M, Trompeter Sara, Stanworth Simon J
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.
Canadian Blood Services, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Br J Haematol. 2025 Jan;206(1):94-108. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19837. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
Red blood cell (RBC) antigen matching beyond ABO and RhD is commonly recommended for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassaemia. We present an updated systematic literature review to inform evidence-based guidelines on RBC matching. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to develop recommendations. Six new observational studies (4 prospective, 2 retrospective) were identified. The six studies reported on 583 patients in total, including cross-over designs, with sample sizes from 10 to 343. Studies were heterogeneous, utilising varying degrees of RBC matching and different definitions for 'extended' matching. All reported on alloimmunisation. One study reported on molecular matching. The reported prevalence of alloimmunisation using limited matching was 0%-50% and with extended matching was 0%-24%. Eighty-two patients were alloimmunised before study entry. The risk of bias across studies was moderate to critical. The guideline panel recommends that ABO, RhDCcEe, and K-compatible RBCs are selected for individuals with SCD and thalassaemia, even in the absence of alloantibodies, and that RBCs which are antigen-negative to already existing clinically significant antibodies are chosen. There is a need for comparative research to define the benefit, impact, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility of extended RBC matching strategies to prevent alloimmunisation.
对于镰状细胞病(SCD)和地中海贫血患者,通常建议在ABO和RhD血型匹配之外进行红细胞(RBC)抗原匹配。我们进行了一项最新的系统文献综述,以为基于证据的红细胞匹配指南提供参考。采用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)工具来制定推荐意见。共纳入6项新的观察性研究(4项前瞻性研究,2项回顾性研究)。这6项研究共报道了583例患者,包括交叉设计,样本量从10例到343例不等。研究具有异质性,采用了不同程度的红细胞匹配以及对“扩展”匹配的不同定义。所有研究均报告了同种免疫情况。一项研究报告了分子匹配情况。使用有限匹配时报道的同种免疫患病率为0%-50%,使用扩展匹配时为0%-24%。82例患者在研究入组前已发生同种免疫。各研究的偏倚风险为中度至严重。指南小组建议,即使在没有同种抗体的情况下,也应为SCD和地中海贫血患者选择ABO、RhDCcEe和K相容的红细胞,并选择对已存在的临床显著抗体呈抗原阴性的红细胞。需要进行比较研究,以确定扩展红细胞匹配策略在预防同种免疫方面的益处、影响、成本效益和可行性。