Casal Roberto F, Lazarus Donald R, Kuhl Kristine, Nogueras-González Graciela, Perusich Sarah, Green Linda K, Ost David E, Sarkiss Mona, Jimenez Carlos A, Eapen Georgie A, Morice Rodolfo C, Cornwell Lorraine, Austria Sheila, Sharafkanneh Amir, Rumbaut Rolando E, Grosu Horiana, Kheradmand Farrah
1 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 1;191(7):796-803. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201409-1615OC.
Data about the influence of the type of sedation on yield, complications, and tolerance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are based mostly on retrospective studies and are largely inconsistent.
To determine whether the type of sedation influences the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA, its complication rates, and patient tolerance.
Patients referred for EBUS-TBNA were randomized (1:1) to undergo this procedure under general anesthesia (GA) or moderate sedation (MS). Pathologists were blinded to group allocation.
The main outcome was "diagnostic yield," defined as the percentage of patients for whom EBUS-TBNA rendered a specific diagnosis. One hundred and forty-nine patients underwent EBUS-TBNA, 75 under GA and 74 under MS. Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were well balanced. Two hundred and thirty-six lymph nodes (LNs) and six masses were sampled in the GA group (average, 3.2 ± 1.9 sites/patient), and 200 LNs and six masses in the MS group (average, 2.8 ± 1.5 sites/patient) (P = 0.199). The diagnostic yield was 70.7% (53 of 75) and 68.9% (51 of 74) for the GA group and MS group, respectively (P = 0.816). The sensitivity was 98.2% in the GA group (confidence interval, 97-100%) and 98.1% in the MS group (confidence interval, 97-100%) (P = 0.979). EBUS was completed in all patients in the GA group, and in 69 patients (93.3%) in the MS group (P = 0.028). There were no major complications or escalation of care in either group. Minor complications were more common in the MS group (29.6 vs. 5.3%) (P < 0.001). Most patients stated they "definitely would" undergo this procedure again in both groups (P = 0.355).
EBUS-TBNA performed under MS results in comparable diagnostic yield, rate of major complications, and patient tolerance as under GA. Future prospective multicenter studies are required to corroborate our findings. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01430962).
关于镇静类型对支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)的取材成功率、并发症及耐受性影响的数据大多基于回顾性研究,且存在很大不一致性。
确定镇静类型是否会影响EBUS-TBNA的诊断取材成功率、并发症发生率及患者耐受性。
将接受EBUS-TBNA检查的患者随机分为两组(1:1),分别在全身麻醉(GA)或中度镇静(MS)下接受该检查。病理学家对分组情况不知情。
主要观察指标为“诊断取材成功率”,定义为EBUS-TBNA能做出明确诊断的患者百分比。149例患者接受了EBUS-TBNA检查,75例在GA下进行,74例在MS下进行。人口统计学和基线临床特征均衡。GA组共取材236个淋巴结(LN)和6个肿物(平均每位患者3.2±1.9个部位),MS组取材200个LN和6个肿物(平均每位患者2.8±1.5个部位)(P = 0.199)。GA组和MS组的诊断取材成功率分别为70.7%(75例中的53例)和68.9%(74例中的51例)(P = 0.816)。GA组的敏感性为98.2%(置信区间97 - 100%),MS组为98.1%(置信区间97 - 100%)(P = 0.979)。GA组所有患者均完成了EBUS检查,MS组有69例(93.3%)完成(P = 0.028)。两组均未出现严重并发症或护理升级情况。MS组的轻微并发症更为常见(29.6%对5.3%)(P < 0.001)。大多数患者表示两组中他们“肯定会”再次接受该检查(P = 0.355)。
在MS下进行EBUS-TBNA的诊断取材成功率、严重并发症发生率及患者耐受性与GA下相当。未来需要前瞻性多中心研究来证实我们的发现。该临床试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT 01430962)。