Hu Yu-He, Xu Wen-Hui, Li Yu-Ying
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Dec 31;16(12):8493-8502. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1117. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a critical method for diagnosing lung cancer. While EBUS-TBNA is commonly performed under conscious sedation, the potential benefits of conducting the procedure under general anesthesia and incorporating rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) to enhance diagnostic yield remain uncertain. This study aims to investigate the impact of anesthesia methods and ROSE on the diagnostic efficacy of EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer.
This study collected data from patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for suspected lung cancer in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine at The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2018 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the anesthesia method used and whether ROSE was performed: the non-general anesthesia group (NGA group), the general anesthesia group (GA group), and the general anesthesia with ROSE group (RGA group). The study analyzed baseline characteristics, puncture details, diagnostic outcomes, and complications across the groups.
The number of puncture needles used in the RGA group was significantly lower than in the other two groups (P<0.001). Most patients received a definitive diagnosis, with malignant tumor diagnostic rates of 80.95%, 85.71%, and 93.44% in the NGA, GA, and RGA groups, respectively (P=0.12). The overall disease diagnostic rates were 76.06%, 79.22%, and 86.11%, respectively (P=0.30). No severe complications occurred in any of the groups. The proportion of patients willing to undergo repeat EBUS-TBNA was significantly lower in the NGA group compared to the other two groups (P=0.002).
Compared to local anesthesia combined with intravenous analgesia and sedation or general anesthesia alone, general anesthesia combined with ROSE reduces the number of puncture needles required during EBUS-TBNA but does not further improve diagnostic efficacy.
支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)是诊断肺癌的关键方法。虽然EBUS-TBNA通常在清醒镇静下进行,但在全身麻醉下进行该操作并结合快速现场评估(ROSE)以提高诊断率的潜在益处仍不确定。本研究旨在探讨麻醉方法和ROSE对EBUS-TBNA诊断肺癌的疗效的影响。
本研究收集了2018年8月至2023年12月在西南医科大学附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科因疑似肺癌接受EBUS-TBNA的患者的数据。根据使用的麻醉方法和是否进行ROSE将患者分为三组:非全身麻醉组(NGA组)、全身麻醉组(GA组)和全身麻醉联合ROSE组(RGA组)。该研究分析了各组的基线特征、穿刺细节、诊断结果和并发症。
RGA组使用的穿刺针数量明显低于其他两组(P<0.001)。大多数患者得到了明确诊断,NGA组、GA组和RGA组的恶性肿瘤诊断率分别为80.95%、85.71%和93.44%(P=0.12)。总体疾病诊断率分别为76.06%、79.22%和86.11%(P=0.30)。所有组均未发生严重并发症。与其他两组相比,NGA组愿意接受重复EBUS-TBNA的患者比例明显较低(P=0.002)。
与局部麻醉联合静脉镇痛镇静或单纯全身麻醉相比,全身麻醉联合ROSE可减少EBUS-TBNA期间所需的穿刺针数量,但并未进一步提高诊断疗效。