Woltin Karl-Andrew, Yzerbyt Vincent
Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique, Brussels, Belgium University of London, Egham, UK Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Mar;41(3):379-92. doi: 10.1177/0146167214566188. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
Based on social projection research, four studies investigated whether people rely on their own regulatory focus when making predictions about others. Chronic (Study 1) and induced (Study 2) regulatory focus shaped estimations of others' strategic promotion or prevention inclinations and choices between enriched (fitting promotion) and impoverished options (fitting prevention). Providing indirect process evidence via boundary conditions, participants only relied on their induced regulatory focus in predictions of others' inclinations to seek romantic alternatives to the extent that this did not run counter to stereotypic gender beliefs (Study 3). In addition, participants only relied on their induced regulatory focus in preference predictions concerning promotion and prevention products when they lacked idiosyncratic target knowledge (Study 4). These effects were not mediated by mood, judgment-certainty, perceived task-enjoyment, or task-difficulty. Implications of these findings for social projection research as well as possible interpersonal consequences are delineated.
基于社会投射研究,四项研究调查了人们在预测他人行为时是否会依赖自身的调节焦点。长期(研究1)和诱发的(研究2)调节焦点塑造了对他人战略促进或预防倾向的估计,以及在丰富选项(适合促进)和匮乏选项(适合预防)之间的选择。通过边界条件提供间接的过程证据,参与者仅在预测他人寻求浪漫替代选择的倾向时依赖其诱发的调节焦点,前提是这与刻板的性别观念不冲突(研究3)。此外,当缺乏特定目标知识时,参与者仅在关于促进和预防产品的偏好预测中依赖其诱发的调节焦点(研究4)。这些效应并非由情绪、判断确定性、感知的任务乐趣或任务难度介导。阐述了这些发现对社会投射研究的意义以及可能的人际后果。