Martin-Fairey C A, Ramanathan C, Stowie A, Walaszczyk E, Smale L, Nunez A A
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Neuroscience. 2015 Mar 12;288:178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.12.040. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
The same clock-genes, including Period (PER) 1 and 2, that show rhythmic expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) are also rhythmically expressed in other brain regions that serve as extra-SCN oscillators. Outside the hypothalamus, the phase of these extra-SCN oscillators appears to be reversed when diurnal and nocturnal mammals are compared. Based on mRNA data, PER1 protein is expected to peak in the late night in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) of nocturnal laboratory rats, but comparable data are not available for a diurnal species. Here we use the diurnal grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus) to describe rhythms of PER1 and 2 proteins in the PVN of animals that either show the species-typical day-active (DA) profile, or that adopt a night-active (NA) profile when given access to running wheels. For DA animals housed with or without wheels, significant rhythms of PER1 or PER2 protein expression featured peaks in the late morning; NA animals showed patterns similar to those expected from nocturnal laboratory rats. Since the PVN is part of the circuit that controls pineal rhythms, we also measured circulating levels of melatonin during the day and night in DA animals with and without wheels and in NA wheel runners. All three groups showed elevated levels of melatonin at night, with higher levels during both the day and night being associated with the levels of activity displayed by each group. The differential phase of rhythms in the clock-gene protein in the PVN of diurnal and nocturnal animals presents a possible mechanism for explaining species differences in the phase of autonomic rhythms controlled, in part, by the PVN. The present study suggests that the phase of the oscillator of the PVN does not determine that of the melatonin rhythm in diurnal and nocturnal species or in diurnal and nocturnal chronotypes within a species.
包括周期蛋白(PER)1和2在内的相同生物钟基因,在视交叉上核(SCN)中呈现节律性表达,在作为额外SCN振荡器的其他脑区也有节律性表达。在下丘脑之外,当比较昼行性和夜行性哺乳动物时,这些额外SCN振荡器的相位似乎是相反的。基于mRNA数据,预计夜行性实验大鼠下丘脑室旁核(PVN)中的PER1蛋白在深夜达到峰值,但对于昼行性物种尚无类似数据。在此,我们使用昼行性草鼠(非洲沼鼠)来描述PVN中PER1和2蛋白的节律,这些动物要么表现出物种典型的白天活跃(DA)模式,要么在有跑轮的情况下采用夜间活跃(NA)模式。对于有无跑轮的DA动物,PER1或PER2蛋白表达的显著节律在上午晚些时候达到峰值;NA动物表现出与夜行性实验大鼠预期相似的模式。由于PVN是控制松果体节律的回路的一部分,我们还测量了有无跑轮的DA动物以及NA跑轮动物白天和夜间的褪黑素循环水平。所有三组动物夜间的褪黑素水平均升高,白天和夜间较高的褪黑素水平与每组动物的活动水平相关。昼行性和夜行性动物PVN中生物钟基因蛋白节律的不同相位,为解释部分由PVN控制的自主节律相位的物种差异提供了一种可能的机制。本研究表明,PVN振荡器的相位并不能决定昼行性和夜行性物种或同一物种内昼行性和夜行性生物钟类型的褪黑素节律相位。