Suppr超能文献

对于肝硬化患者,是否存在更安全的用于内镜下括约肌切开术的电外科电流?

Is there a safer electrosurgical current for endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with liver cirrhosis?

作者信息

Parlak Erkan, Köksal Aydın Şeref, Öztaş Erkin, Dişibeyaz Selçuk, Ödemiş Bülent, Yüksel Mahmut, Yıldız Hakan, Şaşmaz Nurgül, Şahin Burhan

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

Kızılırmak mahallesi, 1443. Cadde, 40/13, Çukurambar, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 Aug;128(15-16):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-014-0677-3. Epub 2015 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy has a higher risk of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Advanced Child stage and coagulopathy are well-known risk factors. We aimed to determine the role of electrosurgical currents in the development of endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective observational study and included 19,642 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between 2004 and 2013. The incidence of endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding in cirrhotic patients who underwent sphincterotomy after 2009 with an electrosurgical generator applying alternating current in the pulse cut mode (Group 2) was compared with a historical control group who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy between 2004 and 2009 via blended current (Group 1).

RESULTS

Group 1 included 15 patients (six women, nine men, mean age: 62.2 ± 12.9 years). Group 2 included 14 patients (six women, eight men, mean age: 63.6 ± 16.9 years). There was no statistically significant difference between the demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups. Endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding was observed in three patients in Group 1 (two endoscopic bleeding and one clinically significant bleeding) and none of the patients in Group 2 (p = 0.77). There were no cases of perforation or pancreatitis in both groups. One patient in Group 2 developed cholangitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding is less frequently observed in patients with cirrhosis who underwent sphincterotomy with alternating mixed current in the pulse cut mode compared with those with blended current.

摘要

背景

内镜下括约肌切开术在肝硬化患者中出血风险较高。Child晚期和凝血功能障碍是众所周知的风险因素。我们旨在确定电外科电流在肝硬化患者内镜下括约肌切开术出血发生中的作用。

方法

本研究为回顾性观察性研究,纳入了2004年至2013年间接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的19642例患者。将2009年后使用脉冲切割模式施加交流电的电外科发生器进行括约肌切开术的肝硬化患者(第2组)内镜下括约肌切开术出血的发生率与2004年至2009年间通过混合电流进行内镜下括约肌切开术的历史对照组(第1组)进行比较。

结果

第1组包括15例患者(6名女性,9名男性,平均年龄:62.2±12.9岁)。第2组包括14例患者(6名女性,8名男性,平均年龄:63.6±16.9岁)。两组的人口统计学和临床特征之间无统计学显著差异。第1组有3例患者发生内镜下括约肌切开术出血(2例内镜下出血和1例具有临床意义的出血),第2组无患者发生出血(p = 0.77)。两组均无穿孔或胰腺炎病例。第2组有1例患者发生胆管炎。

结论

与使用混合电流的患者相比,采用脉冲切割模式的交流电进行括约肌切开术的肝硬化患者内镜下括约肌切开术出血的发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验