Attasaranya Siriboon, Cheon Young Koog, Vittal Harsha, Howell Douglas A, Wakelin Donald E, Cunningham John T, Ajmere Niraj, Ste Marie Ronald W, Bhattacharya Kanishka, Gupta Kapil, Freeman Martin L, Sherman Stuart, McHenry Lee, Watkins James L, Fogel Evan L, Schmidt Suzette, Lehman Glen A
Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1046-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.047. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
The utility and safety of endoscopic biliary orifice balloon dilation (EBD) for bile duct stone removal (with use of large-diameter balloons) after biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy (BES) is currently not well established.
Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of BES followed by > or = 12 mm diameter EBD for bile duct stone removal.
Retrospective, multicenter series.
Five ERCP referral centers in the United States.
Patients who underwent attempted removal of bile duct stones by BES followed by EBD with > or = 12 mm diameter dilating balloons were identified by searching the prospectively recorded endoscopic databases from 1999 to 2007. Clinical parameters, endoscopic data, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.
One hundred three patients, mean age 70 +/- 17 years (range 23-98 years), with 56 (54%) women, underwent 107 procedures. Eleven patients (11%) had a prior history of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatogram was performed in 15 (14%) patients. Median stone size and median balloon diameter used was 13 mm. Complete stone removal in the first session of EBD was accomplished in 102 (95%) procedures, and mechanical lithotripsy was required in 29 (27%). Six patients (5.4%) had documented procedure-related complications including one patient with severe bleeding and one with severe cystic duct perforation. No acute pancreatitis occurred.
EBD with a large-diameter balloon in conjunction with BES for bile duct stone removal is effective and relatively safe. This technique appears to be a reasonable alternative option when standard BES and basket or balloon sweep are inadequate to remove bile duct stones.
目前,内镜下胆管开口球囊扩张术(EBD)(使用大直径球囊)在胆管括约肌切开术(BES)后用于胆管结石清除的效用和安全性尚未完全明确。
我们的目的是评估BES后采用直径≥12mm的EBD进行胆管结石清除的疗效和并发症。
回顾性多中心研究系列。
美国的五个ERCP转诊中心。
通过检索1999年至2007年前瞻性记录的内镜数据库,确定了那些接受BES后再使用直径≥12mm的扩张球囊进行EBD以尝试清除胆管结石的患者。收集并分析临床参数、内镜数据和结果。
103例患者,平均年龄70±17岁(范围23 - 98岁),其中56例(54%)为女性,共接受了107例手术。11例患者(11%)有急性胰腺炎病史。15例(14%)患者进行了胰管造影。结石中位大小和使用的球囊中位直径为13mm。102例(95%)手术在EBD的第一阶段完成了结石完全清除,29例(27%)需要机械碎石术。6例患者(5.4%)发生了与手术相关的并发症,包括1例严重出血患者和1例严重胆囊管穿孔患者。未发生急性胰腺炎。
大直径球囊EBD联合BES用于胆管结石清除是有效且相对安全的。当标准的BES和网篮或球囊清扫不足以清除胆管结石时,该技术似乎是一个合理的替代选择。