Elta G H, Barnett J L, Wille R T, Brown K A, Chey W D, Scheiman J M
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, 48109-0362, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Feb;47(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70348-7.
Complications after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy occur in 8% to 10% of patients when studied prospectively. It is not known whether the type of electrocautery current affects this rate. Theoretically, less edema of the ampulla after a pure cutting current sphincterotomy could decrease the risk of pancreatitis although the risk of postsphincterotomy hemorrhage might be greater.
One hundred seventy patients undergoing sphincterotomy were prospectively randomized to either a blended or pure cut current on the Valleylab electrosurgical unit. The settings were a blended three current at a power setting of 30 watts/sec for both the cut and coagulation currents or a pure cut current at a power setting of 30 watts/sec. The individual determining whether a complication occurred was blinded to the type of current used, and all patients were hospitalized for 24 hours post-procedure. Pancreatitis was defined as mild if fewer than 5 days, moderate if 5 to 14 days, and severe if more than 14 days of hospitalization were required.
Indications for sphincterotomy were choledocholithiasis in 111 patients, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in 36 patients, stent placement in 15 patients, and miscellaneous in 8 patients. There were a total of 16 complications in 170 patients (9%); 4 (5%) were in the pure cut current group of 86 patients (one episode of bleeding that required transfusion of 4 U and three episodes of mild pancreatitis), and 12 (14%) were in the blended current group of 84 patients (7 mild, 2 moderate, and 1 severe pancreatitis; 1 case of cholangitis; and one episode of bleeding that required transfusion of 2 U). There were significantly fewer complications in the pure cut group (p < 0.05 by chi-square).
The use of pure cut current is associated with a lower incidence of pancreatitis, the most common ERCP complication, than with blended current sphincterotomy. An insufficient number of patients were studied to comment on the relative risk of hemorrhage. However, because the complication of hemorrhage is much less common than pancreatitis, pure cut current is safer overall.
前瞻性研究表明,内镜下胆管括约肌切开术后并发症的发生率为8%至10%。目前尚不清楚电灼电流的类型是否会影响这一发生率。理论上,单纯切割电流括约肌切开术后壶腹水肿减轻可能会降低胰腺炎的风险,尽管括约肌切开术后出血的风险可能更高。
170例接受括约肌切开术的患者被前瞻性随机分为使用Valleylab电外科设备的混合电流或单纯切割电流两组。设置为混合电流,切割和凝血电流的功率设置均为30瓦/秒,或者单纯切割电流,功率设置为30瓦/秒。判断是否发生并发症的人员对所使用的电流类型不知情,所有患者术后均住院24小时。胰腺炎的定义为:住院少于5天为轻度,5至14天为中度,超过14天为重度。
括约肌切开术的适应证为:111例患者为胆总管结石,36例患者为Oddi括约肌功能障碍,15例患者为支架置入,8例患者为其他情况。170例患者中共有16例并发症(9%);86例单纯切割电流组中有4例(占5%)(1例出血需输注4单位血液,3例轻度胰腺炎),84例混合电流组中有12例(占14%)(7例轻度、2例中度和1例重度胰腺炎;1例胆管炎;1例出血需输注2单位血液)。单纯切割电流组的并发症明显较少(卡方检验p<0.05)。
与混合电流括约肌切开术相比,使用单纯切割电流可降低最常见的ERCP并发症胰腺炎的发生率。本研究纳入的患者数量不足以对出血的相对风险进行评论。然而,由于出血并发症比胰腺炎少见得多,总体而言单纯切割电流更安全。