• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是时候在理解胚胎选择方面进行范式转变了吗?

Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection?

作者信息

Gleicher Norbert, Kushnir Vitaly A, Barad David H

机构信息

The Center for Human Reproduction, 21 E 69th Street, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Jan 11;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-13-3.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-13-3
PMID:25577140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4326369/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Embryo selection has been an integral feature of in vitro fertilization (IVF) almost since its inception. Since the advent of extended blastocyst stage embryo culture, and especially with increasing popularity of elective single embryo transfer (eSET), the concept of embryo selection has increasingly become a mainstay of routine IVF.

DISCUSSION

We here, however, argue that embryo selection via blastocyst stage embryo transfer (BSET), as currently practiced, at best improves IVF outcomes only for a small minority of patients undergoing IVF cycles. For a large majority BSET is either ineffective or, indeed, may actually be harmful by decreasing IVF pregnancy chances. Overall, only a small minority of patients, thus, benefit from prolonged embryo culture, while BSET, as a tool to enhance IVF outcomes, is increasingly utilized as routine care in IVF for all patients.

SUMMARY

Since newer methods of embryo selection, like preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and closed system embryo incubation with time-lapse photography are practically dependent on BSET, these concepts of embryo selection, currently increasingly adopted in mainstream IVF, require reconsideration. They, automatically, transfer the downsides of BSET, including decreases in IVF pregnancy chances in some patients, to these new procedures, and in addition raise serious questions about cost-effectiveness.

摘要

背景

自体外受精(IVF)诞生以来,胚胎选择几乎一直是其不可或缺的特征。自从延长囊胚期胚胎培养出现以来,尤其是随着选择性单胚胎移植(eSET)越来越受欢迎,胚胎选择的概念日益成为常规IVF的支柱。

讨论

然而,我们在此认为,目前所采用的通过囊胚期胚胎移植(BSET)进行胚胎选择,充其量仅能改善一小部分接受IVF周期治疗的患者的IVF结局。对于大多数患者而言,BSET要么无效,实际上甚至可能因降低IVF妊娠几率而有害。因此,总体而言,只有一小部分患者能从延长胚胎培养中获益,而BSET作为一种改善IVF结局的工具,却越来越多地被用作所有患者IVF的常规治疗手段。

总结

由于较新的胚胎选择方法,如植入前基因筛查(PGS)和采用延时摄影的封闭系统胚胎培养,实际上都依赖于BSET,目前在主流IVF中越来越多地采用的这些胚胎选择概念需要重新审视。它们会自动将BSET的弊端(包括一些患者IVF妊娠几率降低)转嫁到这些新程序上,此外还引发了关于成本效益的严重问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f908/4326369/f50f3bd7326c/12958_2014_1302_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f908/4326369/f50f3bd7326c/12958_2014_1302_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f908/4326369/f50f3bd7326c/12958_2014_1302_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection?是时候在理解胚胎选择方面进行范式转变了吗?
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Jan 11;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-13-3.
2
Comprehensive genetic assessment of the human embryo: can empiric application of microarray comparative genomic hybridization reduce multiple gestation rate by single fresh blastocyst transfer?人类胚胎的综合遗传评估:微阵列比较基因组杂交的经验应用能否通过单次新鲜囊胚转移降低多胎妊娠率?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;286(3):755-61. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2396-1. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
3
Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial.囊胚活检联合全面染色体筛查和新鲜胚胎移植可显著提高体外受精的种植率和临床妊娠率:一项随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
4
Outcomes of trophectoderm biopsy on cryopreserved blastocysts: a case series.冷冻囊胚滋养层活检的结局:病例系列。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Nov;25(5):504-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.06.021. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis.综合染色体筛查改善胚胎选择:一项荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Dec;104(6):1503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
6
Single blastocyst embryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer but results in healthier pregnancy outcomes.单囊胚胚胎移植与双卵裂期胚胎移植的妊娠率相当,但妊娠结局更健康。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Oct;51(5):406-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01324.x. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
7
Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates.BEST 试验的产科和新生儿结局:对体外受精进行非整倍体筛查的单胚胎移植可改善结局而不降低分娩率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):157.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
8
[How can we nowadays select the best embryo to transfer?].如今我们如何选择最佳胚胎进行移植?
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Jul-Aug;42(7-8):515-25. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
9
Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.标准囊胚形态、整倍体与着床的相关性:两个中心涉及 956 枚筛选囊胚的观察性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1173-81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Single embryo transfer: Why and how to identify the embryo with the best developmental potential.单胚胎移植:如何以及为何识别具有最佳发育潜能的胚胎。
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Feb;33(1):77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Why the hypothesis of embryo selection in IVF/ICSI must finally be reconsidered.为何必须最终重新审视体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射中的胚胎选择假说。
Hum Reprod Open. 2025 Mar 20;2025(2):hoaf011. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaf011. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical outcome of different embryo transfer strategies after late rescue ICSI procedure: a 10-year total fertilisation failure cohort study.不同胚胎移植策略在晚期补救 ICSI 术后的临床结局:一项 10 年总受精失败队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05859-0.
3
The Effectiveness of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Against Experimental Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Ovaries and Its Effect on In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope.胚胎培养和形态动力学分析选择的临床验证:胚胎镜的随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1287-1294.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
2
The practice of in vitro fertilization according to the published literature.根据已发表文献进行的体外受精实践。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Sep;102(3):658-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
3
Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?
粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)对大鼠卵巢实验性缺血再灌注损伤的有效性及其对体外受精结局的影响。
Reprod Sci. 2023 May;30(5):1660-1667. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01132-5. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
4
From contemplation to classification of chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos.从思考到人类胚胎植入前染色体嵌合体的分类。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Nov;38(11):2833-2848. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02304-z. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
5
'Two countries-two labs': the transnational gamete donation (TGD) programme to support egg donation.“两个国家——两个实验室”:支持卵子捐赠的跨国配子捐赠(TGD)项目
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Dec;37(12):3039-3049. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01961-w. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
6
The Association Between Embryo Quality, Number of Transferred Embryos and Live Birth Rate After Vitrified Cleavage-Stage Embryos and Blastocyst Transfer.玻璃化卵裂期胚胎和囊胚移植后胚胎质量、移植胚胎数量与活产率之间的关联
Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 14;11:930. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00930. eCollection 2020.
7
Morula transfer achieves better clinical outcomes than post-thawed cleavage embryos after overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.在冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期中,过夜培养后,桑葚胚转移比解冻后的卵裂期胚胎能获得更好的临床结局。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Apr;37(4):945-952. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01708-7. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles.卵母细胞捐赠周期中卵裂期胚胎与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jun 20;55(6):293. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060293.
9
Propensity score-matched study and meta-analysis of cumulative outcomes of day 2/3 versus day 5/6 embryo transfers.倾向评分匹配研究和荟萃分析第 2/3 天与第 5/6 天胚胎移植累积结局。
Front Med. 2017 Dec;11(4):563-569. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0535-6. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.与临床体外受精中的传统方法相比,延时成像在胚胎培养和选择方面是否有良好的结果?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析和系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178720. eCollection 2017.
循证医学:一场危机中的运动?
BMJ. 2014 Jun 13;348:g3725. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3725.
4
Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.应用延时监测选择人类胚胎的临床结局:系统评价。
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu023. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Preterm births, multiples, and fertility treatment: recommendations for changes to policy and clinical practices.早产、多胞胎与生育治疗:政策及临床实践变革建议
Fertil Steril. 2014 Jul;102(1):36-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
6
Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still in search of a clinical application: a systematic review.着床前基因筛查(PGS)仍在探寻临床应用:一项系统综述
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Mar 15;12:22. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-22.
7
National reporting of in vitro fertilization success rates: how do we get patients useful information?体外受精成功率的全国报告:我们如何为患者提供有用信息?
Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1210-1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.024. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
8
Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results.应用比较基因组杂交微阵列(array-CGH)进行胚胎评估:临床结果。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 15;99(4):1044-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.094. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
9
A review of, and commentary on, the ongoing second clinical introduction of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to routine IVF practice.对胚胎植入前遗传学筛查(PGS)在常规体外受精(IVF)实践中的第二次临床引入进行回顾和评论。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Nov;29(11):1159-66. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9871-2. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
10
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub4.