Stice Eric, Rohde Paul, Butryn Meghan, Menke Katharine S, Marti C Nathan
Oregon Research Institute, USA.
Oregon Research Institute, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Feb;65:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.012. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
The authors conducted a pilot trial of a new dissonance-based group eating disorder treatment designed to be a cost-effective front-line transdiagnostic treatment that could be more widely disseminated than extant individual or family treatments that are more expensive and difficult to deliver. Young women with a DSM-5 eating disorder (N = 72) were randomized to an 8-week dissonance-based Counter Attitudinal Therapy group treatment or a usual care control condition, completing diagnostic interviews and questionnaires at pre, post, and 2-month follow-up. Intent-to-treat analyses revealed that intervention participants showed greater reductions in outcomes than usual care controls in a multivariate multilevel model (χ(2)[6] = 34.1, p < .001), producing large effects for thin-ideal internalization (d = .79), body dissatisfaction (d = 1.14), and blinded interview-assessed eating disorder symptoms (d = .95), and medium effects for dissonance regarding perpetuating the thin ideal (d = .65) and negative affect (d = .55). Midway through this pilot we refined engagement procedures, which was associated with increased effect sizes (e.g., the d for eating disorder symptoms increased from .51 to 2.30). This new group treatment produced large reductions in eating disorder symptoms, which is encouraging because it requires about 1/20th the therapist time necessary for extant individual and family treatments, and has the potential to provide a cost-effective and efficacious approach to reaching the majority of individuals with eating disorders who do not presently received treatment.
作者进行了一项新的基于认知失调的团体饮食失调治疗的试点试验,该治疗旨在成为一种具有成本效益的一线跨诊断治疗方法,相比现有的个体或家庭治疗方法,它成本更低且更易于推广,而现有的治疗方法成本更高且实施难度更大。患有DSM-5饮食失调的年轻女性(N = 72)被随机分配到为期8周的基于认知失调的反态度疗法团体治疗组或常规护理对照组,在治疗前、治疗后和2个月随访时完成诊断访谈和问卷调查。意向性分析显示,在多变量多层次模型中,干预组参与者在治疗效果上的改善比常规护理对照组更大(χ(2)[6] = 34.1,p <.001),在瘦理想内化(d =.79)、身体不满(d = 1.14)和盲法访谈评估的饮食失调症状(d =.95)方面产生了较大效果,在维持瘦理想的认知失调(d =.65)和消极情绪(d =.55)方面产生了中等效果。在该试点试验进行到一半时,我们改进了参与程序,这与效应量的增加有关(例如,饮食失调症状的d值从.51增加到2.30)。这种新的团体治疗方法使饮食失调症状大幅减少,这令人鼓舞,因为它所需的治疗师时间约为现有个体和家庭治疗的1/20,并且有可能为大多数目前未接受治疗的饮食失调患者提供一种具有成本效益且有效的治疗方法。