Maas Joyce, Simeunovic-Ostojic Mladena, Bodde Nynke M G
Centre for Eating Disorders, GGZ Oost-Brabant, Wesselmanlaan 25a, 5707 HA, Helmond, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J Eat Disord. 2023 May 2;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00784-1.
Dissonance-based eating disorder programs have successfully targeted body dissatisfaction by challenging the thin beauty ideal in the preventive context and in groups of patients with a subthreshold and full threshold DSM-5 eating disorder. As there is a need for interventions specifically targeting thin-ideal internalization in (highly) specialized treatment centres, the present study adapted Stice's et al.'s Body Project for its use as an add-on treatment for severe eating disorders with the aims to identify whether it was feasible and acceptable in this treatment context, to determine any necessary modifications with regard to the treatment and study procedures, and to test preliminary effectiveness.
The study was a randomized controlled pilot/feasibility trial. Thirty patients started in the Body Project group and 25 in the Psycho-education group. Measurements took place pre- and post-intervention, and at three and six months follow-up. Patients and staff evaluated treatment and study procedures, and patients completed questionnaires on thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, self-objectification, negative affect and eating disorder pathology.
The Body Project group and Psycho-education group both proved highly feasible and acceptable, as well as preliminarily effective, based on quantitative scores and qualitative feedback. Preliminary analyses showed that treatment effects did not differ between treatment groups. As both groups were an add-on to standard treatment, treatment effects cannot be disentangled from effects resulting from standard treatment. Qualitative feedback for the Body Project group included several recommendations for future implementation: increasing the number of treatment sessions, creating homogeneous therapy groups, and optimizing timing of the treatment.
Future research should examine further modifications to the Body Project group for severe eating disorders, as well as for whom, and when in the course of treatment the intervention is most effective. The present study also showed the benefits of implementing a structured Psycho-education group. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of a group intervention targeting the thin beauty ideal (Body Project group) in patients with severe eating disorders and compared this intervention to a group intervention focusing on psycho-education about eating disorders (Psycho-education group). Both interventions were added to standard treatment. We adapted the protocol for patients with severe eating disorders. Both the Body Project group and the Psycho-education group were evaluated by patients as well as staff as highly feasible and acceptable, and effects were positive. Treatment effects did not differ between treatment groups. As both treatments were an add-on to standard treatment, treatment effects cannot be disentangled from effects resulting from standard treatment. The study suggested further modifications to the Body Project group. Future research should examine these modifications as well as for whom, and when in the course of treatment the intervention is most effective. The present study also showed the benefits of implementing a structured Psycho-education group.
基于认知失调的饮食失调项目通过在预防环境中以及针对亚阈值和完全阈值的DSM-5饮食失调患者群体挑战瘦美理想,成功地解决了身体不满问题。由于在(高度)专业化治疗中心需要有专门针对瘦理想内化的干预措施,本研究对斯泰斯等人的身体计划进行了调整,将其用作严重饮食失调的附加治疗,目的是确定其在这种治疗背景下是否可行和可接受,确定治疗和研究程序方面的任何必要修改,并测试初步有效性。
该研究是一项随机对照试验/可行性试验。30名患者开始参加身体计划组,25名患者参加心理教育组。在干预前和干预后以及在三个月和六个月的随访时进行测量。患者和工作人员对治疗和研究程序进行了评估,患者完成了关于瘦理想内化、身体不满、自我客体化、消极情绪和饮食失调病理学的问卷调查。
根据定量评分和定性反馈,身体计划组和心理教育组均被证明高度可行且可接受,并且初步有效。初步分析表明,治疗组之间的治疗效果没有差异。由于两组都是标准治疗的附加治疗,因此无法将治疗效果与标准治疗产生的效果区分开来。身体计划组收到的定性反馈包括对未来实施的一些建议:增加治疗课程的数量、创建同质治疗组以及优化治疗时间。
未来的研究应进一步研究对严重饮食失调患者的身体计划组进行的修改,以及该干预措施对哪些人有效,以及在治疗过程中的何时最有效。本研究还显示了实施结构化心理教育组的益处。我们测试了针对严重饮食失调患者的以瘦美理想为目标的团体干预(身体计划组)的可行性和可接受性,并将该干预措施与专注于饮食失调心理教育的团体干预(心理教育组)进行了比较。两种干预措施均添加到标准治疗中。我们针对严重饮食失调患者调整了方案。身体计划组和心理教育组在患者和工作人员评估中均被认为高度可行且可接受,并且效果是积极的。治疗组之间的治疗效果没有差异。由于两种治疗都是标准治疗的附加治疗方法,因此无法将治疗效果与标准治疗产生的效果区分开来。该研究建议对身体计划组进行进一步修改。未来的研究应研究这些修改以及该干预措施对哪些人有效,以及在治疗过程中的何时最有效。本研究还显示了实施结构化心理教育组的益处。