• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人胆结石相关疾病:是否有改善空间?

Gallstone-related disease in the elderly: is there room for improvement?

作者信息

García-Alonso Francisco Javier, de Lucas Gallego María, Bonillo Cambrodón Daniel, Algaba Alicia, de la Poza Gema, Martín-Mateos Rosa María, Bermejo Fernando

机构信息

Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain,

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Jun;60(6):1770-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3497-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-014-3497-4
PMID:25577265
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Elderly patients are frequently affected by gallstone-related disease. Current guidelines support cholecystectomy after a first acute biliary complication. In the aging, these recommendations are irregularly followed.

METHODS

We analyzed data from patients 65 or older admitted between June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2013 with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, cholangitis, or cholecystitis. Diagnosis and severity assessment were defined according to current guidelines. Harms, mortality, and cholecystectomy rates were evaluated. Baseline factors independently predicting cholecystectomy were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 491 patients were included. The median age was 78.8 years, and 51.7 % were women. Acute cholecystitis was present in 51.7 %, acute pancreatitis in 36.5 %, and acute cholangitis in 11.8 %. Cholecystectomy was performed in 47.1 %. Age, myocardial infarct, dementia, diabetes, nonmetastatic tumor, and severe liver disease were risk factors for not undergoing surgery. Complications related to hospital stay appeared in 33 % of patients. Surgery, cholecystostomy, and ERCP presented harms in 21-25 %. Overall mortality rate was 5.4 %: 10.4 % in acute cholangitis, 6.8 % in acute cholecystitis, and 2.2 % in acute pancreatitis. Mild cases presented a 1.3 % mortality, while 28.6 % of severe cases died. After discharge, 24.7 % of patients presented a new biliary complication, 9.7 % of them severe. Relapse was more frequent in patients managed without invasive procedures, 42.3 % than in cholecystectomy patients, 9.9 % (p < 0.001) and than in ERCP patients, 19.4 % (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Cholecystectomy should be recommended to elderly patients after a first acute biliary complication. If not previously performed, ERCP should be offered as an alternative when surgery is contraindicated or refused.

摘要

背景与目的

老年患者常受胆结石相关疾病影响。当前指南支持在首次急性胆道并发症发生后行胆囊切除术。在老年人群中,这些建议并未得到规范遵循。

方法

我们分析了2004年6月30日至2013年6月30日期间收治的65岁及以上诊断为急性胰腺炎、胆管炎或胆囊炎患者的数据。根据当前指南进行诊断和严重程度评估。评估不良事件、死亡率和胆囊切除率。确定独立预测胆囊切除术的基线因素。

结果

共纳入491例患者。中位年龄为78.8岁,51.7%为女性。急性胆囊炎占51.7%,急性胰腺炎占36.5%,急性胆管炎占11.8%。47.1%的患者接受了胆囊切除术。年龄、心肌梗死、痴呆、糖尿病、非转移性肿瘤和严重肝病是未接受手术的危险因素。33%的患者出现与住院相关的并发症。手术、胆囊造瘘术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的不良事件发生率为21%-25%。总死亡率为5.4%:急性胆管炎为10.4%,急性胆囊炎为6.8%,急性胰腺炎为2.2%。轻症患者死亡率为1.3%,而重症患者死亡率为28.6%。出院后,24.7%的患者出现新的胆道并发症,其中9.7%为重症。未接受侵入性治疗的患者复发更频繁,为42.3%,高于胆囊切除术后患者的9.9%(p<0.001),也高于ERCP术后患者的19.4%(p=0.01)。

结论

老年患者首次发生急性胆道并发症后应建议行胆囊切除术。如果之前未进行手术,当手术禁忌或被拒绝时,应提供ERCP作为替代方案。

相似文献

1
Gallstone-related disease in the elderly: is there room for improvement?老年人胆结石相关疾病:是否有改善空间?
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Jun;60(6):1770-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3497-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
2
Small Gallstone Size and Delayed Cholecystectomy Increase the Risk of Recurrent Pancreatobiliary Complications After Resolved Acute Biliary Pancreatitis.小结石大小和延迟胆囊切除术会增加急性胆源性胰腺炎缓解后复发性胰胆并发症的风险。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Mar;62(3):777-783. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4428-3. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
Choledocholithiasis in elderly patients with gallbladder in situ - is ERCP sufficient?老年原位胆囊患者胆总管结石——内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是否足够?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Nov;53(10-11):1388-1392. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1524022. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Is Surgery Safe in Gallstone-Related Acute Diseases in Elderly Patients?手术对于老年胆结石相关急性疾病患者是否安全?
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Jun;26(6):471-5.
5
Nationwide epidemiological study of severe gallstone disease in Taiwan.台湾地区重症胆结石疾病的全国性流行病学研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug 22;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-63.
6
Can abdominal surgical emergencies be treated in an ambulatory setting?腹部外科急症可以在门诊环境中进行治疗吗?
J Visc Surg. 2015 Dec;152(6 Suppl):S81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
7
Routine surveillance cholangiography after percutaneous cholecystostomy delays drain removal and cholecystectomy.经皮胆囊造瘘术后进行常规监测胆管造影会延迟引流管拔除和胆囊切除术。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):351-355. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001315.
8
Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe.二级和三级急性结石性胆囊炎的择期胆囊切除术是可行且安全的。
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Nov;85(11):854-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12986. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
9
Cholecystectomy following acute presentation to a major New Zealand metropolitan hospital: change to the timing of surgery is needed.在新西兰一家大型都市医院急性发病后进行胆囊切除术:需要改变手术时机。
N Z Med J. 2006 Aug 4;119(1239):U2104.
10
Management of acute cholecystitis: prevalence of percutaneous cholecystostomy and delayed cholecystectomy in the elderly.急性胆囊炎的治疗:老年人经皮胆囊造口术和延期胆囊切除术的流行情况。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Feb;18(2):328-33. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2341-z. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cholecystitis Treatment and Outcomes Among People Living With Dementia.痴呆症患者的胆囊炎治疗与结局
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jul;73(7):2088-2096. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19487. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage: A Comprehensive Review on Indications, Techniques, and Future Perspectives.内镜下胆囊引流:关于适应证、技术及未来展望的综合述评
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 14;60(4):633. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040633.
3
Implications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Patients with Acute Cholangitis: A Systematic Review of Current Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis.美国胃肠病学会指南:急性胰腺炎的管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
2
TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).TG13 急性胆囊炎的诊断标准及严重程度分级(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0568-9.
3
TG13 surgical management of acute cholecystitis.TG13 急性胆囊炎的手术治疗。
2型糖尿病对急性胆管炎患者的影响:当前文献的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;10(11):2196. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112196.
4
A Predictive Model for the Risk of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Gallstones.胆囊病患者认知障碍风险的预测模型。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jul 17;2021:3792407. doi: 10.1155/2021/3792407. eCollection 2021.
5
Safety and clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents in patients with dwell time over one year.留置时间超过一年的患者使用管腔贴附金属支架进行内镜超声引导下胆囊引流的安全性及临床结局
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):514-521. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0395. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
Management of complicated gallstones in the elderly: comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment options.老年人复杂胆结石的管理:手术与非手术治疗方案比较
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Jun;7(3):205-211. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goy046. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Evolution in the management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly: population-based cohort study.老年人急性胆囊炎治疗的演变:基于人群的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4078-4086. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6092-5. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
8
Are They Too Old for Surgery? Safety of Cholecystectomy in Superelderly Patients (≥ Age 90).他们年龄太大不能做手术了吗?超高龄患者(≥90岁)行胆囊切除术的安全性
Perm J. 2017;21:16-013. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-013.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0567-x.
4
TG13 current terminology, etiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis.急性胆管炎和胆囊炎的 TG13 现行术语、病因和流行病学。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):8-23. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0564-0.
5
TG13 guidelines for diagnosis and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos).急性胆管炎的诊断和严重程度分级 TG13 指南(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):24-34. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0561-3.
6
Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.急性胰腺炎的分类-2012:亚特兰大分类修订和国际共识定义。
Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
7
Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update.美国胃肠道疾病负担:2012 年更新。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-1187.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
8
Deciphering harm measurement.解读伤害测量。
JAMA. 2012 May 23;307(20):2155-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3649.
9
Moderately severe acute pancreatitis: prospective validation of this new subgroup of acute pancreatitis.中度重症急性胰腺炎:这种新的急性胰腺炎亚组的前瞻性验证。
Pancreas. 2012 Mar;41(2):306-9. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318229794e.
10
Gallstone pancreatitis in older patients: Are we operating enough?老年胆石性胰腺炎:我们的手术量足够吗?
Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):515-25. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.072.