Suppr超能文献

用言语和手势总结倾斜感知;对谢弗、麦克马纳马、斯旺克、威廉姆斯和德金(2014年)相关性研究的一种实证替代方法。

Summarizing slant perception with words and hands; an empirical alternative to correlations in Shaffer, McManama, Swank, Williams & Durgin (2014).

作者信息

Eves Frank F

机构信息

School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom, B15 2TT.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Feb;155:77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

Abstract

The paper by Shaffer, McManama, Swank, Williams & Durgin (2014) uses correlations between palm-board and verbal estimates of geographical slant to argue against dissociation of the two measures. This paper reports the correlations between the verbal, visual and palm-board measures of geographical slant used by Proffitt and co-workers as a counterpoint to the analyses presented by Shaffer and colleagues. The data are for slant perception of staircases in a station (N=269), a shopping mall (N=229) and a civic square (N=109). In all three studies, modest correlations between the palm-board matches and the verbal reports were obtained. Multiple-regression analyses of potential contributors to verbal reports, however, indicated no unique association between verbal and palm-board measures. Data from three further studies (combined N=528) also show no evidence of any relationship. Shared method variance between visual and palm-board matches could account for the modest association between palm-boards and verbal reports.

摘要

沙弗、麦克马纳马、斯旺克、威廉姆斯和德金(2014年)的论文利用掌板测量与地理倾斜度的口头估计之间的相关性,来反驳这两种测量方法相互分离的观点。本文报告了普罗菲特及其同事使用的地理倾斜度的口头、视觉和掌板测量之间的相关性,作为对沙弗及其同事所做分析的回应。数据来自对一个车站(N = 269)、一个购物中心(N = 229)和一个市政广场(N = 109)中楼梯倾斜度的感知。在所有三项研究中,掌板匹配与口头报告之间都得到了适度的相关性。然而,对口头报告的潜在影响因素进行的多元回归分析表明,口头和掌板测量之间没有独特的关联。另外三项研究(合并样本量N = 528)的数据也没有显示出任何关系的证据。视觉和掌板匹配之间的共同方法方差可以解释掌板与口头报告之间的适度关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验