Kiremit Murat Can, Guven Selcuk, Sarica Kemal, Ozturk Ahmet, Buldu Ibrahim, Kafkasli Alper, Balasar Mehmet, Istanbulluoglu Okan, Horuz Rahim, Cetinel Cihangir Ali, Kandemir Abdulkadir, Albayrak Selami
1 Department of Urology, Medical Faculty of Medipol University , Istanbul, Turkey .
2 Department of Urology, Kartal Education and Research Hospital , Istanbul, Turkey .
J Endourol. 2015 Jul;29(7):838-43. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0698. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
To evaluate contemporary management approaches to medium-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.
A total of 935 patients treated for medium-sized renal stones (10-20 mm) between July 2012 and March 2014 were included in the study program. Contemporary minimally invasive approaches applied in the management of such stones were evaluated and compared.
The cohort consisted of 561 male (60%) and 374 female (40%) patients. Of the 935 patients with medium-sized renal calculi, 535 (57.2%) were treated with shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), 201 (21.4%) with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), 110 (11.7%) with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (miniperc), and the remaining 89 (11.7%) patients with micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc). In the SWL group, stones were located mostly in the pelvis (51%), while in the miniperc and microperc groups, they were located mainly in the lower pole (46%, 53%, respectively). Stone-free rates after a single session were 77.2%, 86.1%, 88.8%, and 83.6% in the SWL, RIRS, microperc, and miniperc groups, respectively. Although no serious complications (above Clavien level III) were noted in any of the groups evaluated, Clavien I to II complications were common in the miniperc group.
Although SWL is the preferred treatment option for patients with medium-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones, endourologic methods also have been found to have a significant role. Relatively lower complication rates along with higher stone-free status observed with the RIRS technique compared with percutaneous approaches have made this method a valuable option in the management of such stones in recent years.
评估当代对中等大小(10 - 20毫米)肾结石的治疗方法。
共有935例在2012年7月至2014年3月期间接受中等大小肾结石(10 - 20毫米)治疗的患者纳入研究项目。对用于此类结石治疗的当代微创方法进行评估和比较。
该队列包括561例男性(60%)和374例女性(40%)患者。在935例中等大小肾结石患者中,535例(57.2%)接受了冲击波碎石术(SWL),201例(21.4%)接受了逆行肾内手术(RIRS),110例(11.7%)接受了微创经皮肾镜取石术(miniperc),其余89例(11.7%)患者接受了微通道经皮肾镜取石术(microperc)。在SWL组中,结石大多位于肾盂(51%),而在miniperc和microperc组中,结石主要位于下极(分别为46%、53%)。单次治疗后的结石清除率在SWL、RIRS、microperc和miniperc组中分别为77.2%、86.1%、88.8%和83.6%。虽然在评估的任何组中均未发现严重并发症(Clavien III级以上),但Clavien I至II级并发症在miniperc组中很常见。
虽然SWL是中等大小(10 - 20毫米)肾结石患者的首选治疗选择,但腔内泌尿外科方法也被发现具有重要作用。与经皮方法相比,RIRS技术观察到相对较低的并发症发生率以及较高的结石清除状态,使得该方法近年来成为此类结石治疗中的一个有价值的选择。