Chorpita Bruce F, Rotheram-Borus Mary Jane, Daleiden Eric L, Bernstein Adam, Cromley Taya, Swendeman Dallas, Regan Jennifer
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;6(5):493-7. doi: 10.1177/1745691611418240.
Kazdin and Blase (2011) propose that traditional models of delivering therapy require more resources than are available to address the scope of mental illness. We argue that finding new platforms and avenues for our existing treatments is a good start but that it is not enough. We contend that the field also needs to develop formal strategies to reorganize its increasing abundance of knowledge to address the scarcity of resources for its application. If we can better utilize our existing knowledge, treatment delivery and service resource allocation can become more efficient and effective. If the field continues with its almost singular emphasis on knowledge proliferation (e.g., developing new treatments), as opposed to knowledge management (e.g., developing new ways to design, apply, and organize existing treatments), the problem outlined by Kazdin and Blase cannot be solved.
卡兹丁和布莱斯(2011年)提出,传统的治疗模式需要比现有资源更多的资源来应对精神疾病的范围。我们认为,为现有治疗方法寻找新的平台和途径是一个良好的开端,但这还不够。我们认为,该领域还需要制定正式策略,重新组织其日益丰富的知识,以解决应用资源稀缺的问题。如果我们能更好地利用现有知识,治疗服务的提供和服务资源的分配就能变得更高效、更有效。如果该领域继续几乎只强调知识的增长(例如,开发新的治疗方法),而不是知识管理(例如,开发设计、应用和组织现有治疗方法的新方法),那么卡兹丁和布莱斯所概述的问题就无法解决。