Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2LASER ANALYTICA, New York, New York.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Mar;72(3):276-86. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3638.
Despite increased carotid artery stenting (CAS) dissemination following the 2005 National Coverage Determination, to our knowledge, periprocedural and long-term outcomes have not been described among Medicare beneficiaries.
To describe the incidence of outcomes during and after the periprocedural period among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing CAS.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study with a mean follow-up time of approximately 2 years among 22,516 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries at least 66 years old undergoing CAS (2005-2009) who were linked to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' CAS database. Database procedure dates were required to fall during a Medicare hospitalization for CAS.
Periprocedural (30-day) and long-term risks of mortality and stroke or transient ischemic attack, as well as periprocedural myocardial infarction. Subgroups were based on sociodemographic, clinical, and center-level factors, as well as the Stenting and Angioplasty With Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) trial or Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST) enrollment criteria.
The mean patient age was 76.3 years, 60.5% were male, 93.8% were of white race, 91.2% were at high surgical risk, 47.4% were symptomatic, and 97.4% had carotid stenosis of at least 70%. Crude 30-day mortality, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction risks were 1.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-1.8%), 3.3% (95% CI, 3.0%-3.5%), and 2.5% (95% CI, 2.3%-2.7%), respectively. Mortality during a mean follow-up time of 2 years was 32.0% (95% CI, 31.0%-33.0%), with rates of 37.3% (95% CI, 35.8%-38.7%) among symptomatic patients and 27.7% (95% CI, 26.4%-28.9%) among asymptomatic patients. Older age, symptomatic carotid stenosis, and nonelective hospital admission were associated with increased adjusted hazards of mortality and stroke or transient ischemic attack during and after the periprocedural period. The presence of a stroke center, government ownership, and a hospital bed capacity of 500 or more were associated with increased adjusted hazards of periprocedural mortality and stroke or transient ischemic attack. Few patients met the SAPPHIRE trial or CREST enrollment criteria primarily because physicians did not meet proficiency requirements either due to exceeding periprocedural complication trial thresholds or not meeting minimum CAS volume requirements.
Competing risks may limit the benefits of CAS in certain Medicare beneficiaries, particularly among older and symptomatic patients who have higher periprocedural and long-term mortality risks. The generalizability of trials like the SAPPHIRE or CREST to the Medicare population may be limited, underscoring the need to evaluate real-world effectiveness of carotid stenosis treatments.
尽管自 2005 年国家覆盖范围决定以来,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的应用有所增加,但据我们所知,在医疗保险受益人群中,尚未描述围手术期和长期结局。
描述在医疗保险受益人群中接受 CAS 期间和之后的围手术期结局的发生率。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项观察性研究,22516 名至少 66 岁的接受 CAS(2005-2009 年)的按服务收费的医疗保险受益人群,平均随访时间约为 2 年,他们与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的 CAS 数据库相关联。数据库程序日期必须在 CAS 的医疗保险住院期间进行。
围手术期(30 天)和死亡率、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作以及围手术期心肌梗死的长期风险。亚组基于社会人口统计学、临床和中心水平的因素,以及支架置入和血管成形术与高内膜切除术风险患者保护(SAPPHIRE)试验或颈动脉血管重建内膜切除术与支架置入试验(CREST)纳入标准。
患者平均年龄为 76.3 岁,60.5%为男性,93.8%为白人,91.2%为高手术风险,47.4%有症状,97.4%颈动脉狭窄至少 70%。30 天的死亡率、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作和心肌梗死的粗发生率分别为 1.7%(95%CI,1.5%-1.8%)、3.3%(95%CI,3.0%-3.5%)和 2.5%(95%CI,2.3%-2.7%)。在平均 2 年的随访期间,死亡率为 32.0%(95%CI,31.0%-33.0%),其中有症状患者的死亡率为 37.3%(95%CI,35.8%-38.7%),无症状患者的死亡率为 27.7%(95%CI,26.4%-28.9%)。年龄较大、有症状的颈动脉狭窄和非择期住院与围手术期和术后死亡率和卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的调整后的危险增加相关。存在卒中中心、政府所有和 500 张或更多病床与围手术期死亡率和卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的调整后危险增加相关。很少有患者符合 SAPPHIRE 试验或 CREST 纳入标准,主要是因为医生没有达到熟练程度要求,要么是因为围手术期并发症试验的阈值,要么是因为没有达到最低 CAS 量要求。
竞争风险可能会限制某些医疗保险受益人群中 CAS 的益处,特别是在年龄较大和有症状的患者中,他们有更高的围手术期和长期死亡率风险。像 SAPPHIRE 或 CREST 这样的试验在 Medicare 人群中的推广可能会受到限制,这突出表明需要评估颈动脉狭窄治疗的真实世界效果。