• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.1999 - 2014年美国医疗保险人群中的颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1035-1046. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12882.
2
Outcomes after carotid artery stenting in Medicare beneficiaries, 2005 to 2009.2005 年至 2009 年 Medicare 受益人的颈动脉支架置入术治疗结果。
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Mar;72(3):276-86. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3638.
3
Surgeon case volume and 30-day mortality after carotid endarterectomy among contemporary medicare beneficiaries: before and after national coverage determination for carotid artery stenting.当代医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉内膜切除术后外科医生的手术量与30天死亡率:在国家确定颈动脉支架置入术覆盖范围之前和之后
Stroke. 2015 May;46(5):1288-94. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006276. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较疗效
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):275-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002336. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.经颈动脉血运重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄患者卒中和死亡的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 17;322(23):2313-2322. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18441.
6
Risk of Stroke, Death, and Myocardial Infarction Following Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients With Standard Surgical Risk.在标准手术风险患者中,经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术相比的卒中、死亡和心肌梗死风险。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 May 1;80(5):437-444. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0285.
7
Geographic variation in carotid revascularization among Medicare beneficiaries, 2003-2006.2003 - 2006年医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉血运重建的地域差异
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jul 26;170(14):1218-25. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.194.
8
Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis.颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的长期结果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1021-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505215. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
National trends in carotid artery revascularization surgery.颈动脉血运重建手术的国家趋势。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1251-7. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS111320. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
10
Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.在美国2005年,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术增加了术后中风、死亡及资源利用的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of postoperative stroke after transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术后卒中的预测因素
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.023.
2
Effectiveness of Transcarotid vs Transfemoral Carotid Stenting for Stroke Prevention.经颈动脉与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中的有效性比较
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e259143. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9143.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs. Carotid Stenting: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术的成本效益:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s12975-025-01347-z.
4
Clinical and radiological profie changes of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy over 40 years.40多年来接受颈动脉内膜切除术患者的临床和影像学特征变化
Surg Neurol Int. 2025 Mar 28;16:113. doi: 10.25259/SNI_152_2025. eCollection 2025.
5
Intravascular lithotripsy prior to transcarotid arterial revascularization: A technical tale of two cases.经颈动脉血管重建术前的血管内碎石术:两例技术案例
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024 Dec 6;12:2050313X241297217. doi: 10.1177/2050313X241297217. eCollection 2024.
6
Curve-centered plaques raise the risk of peri-operative neurological and cardiovascular complications during angioplasty and stenting for severe carotid stenosis.在严重颈动脉狭窄的血管成形术和支架置入术中,以曲线为中心的斑块会增加围手术期神经和心血管并发症的风险。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 7;15:1455135. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1455135. eCollection 2024.
7
Racial Differences in Adoption and Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization among High-Risk Adults with Carotid Artery Stenosis.高危颈动脉狭窄成人经颈动脉血管重建术的采用情况及预后的种族差异。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;113:370-381. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.036. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
8
Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization.适宜性评估:无症状性颈动脉狭窄,包括颈动脉血运重建术。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;37(2):179-187. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
9
CREST-2 Reaches A Surgical Milestone.CREST-2 达成一项外科手术里程碑。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb;79(2):195-197.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.045. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
10
Significance of atherosclerotic plaque location in recanalizing non-acute long-segment occlusion of the internal carotid artery.颈内动脉长节段非急性闭塞再通中粥样硬化斑块位置的意义。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61938-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Clinical Trial Results on the Temporal Trends of Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting From 2002 to 2014.2002年至2014年临床试验结果对颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术时间趋势的影响
Stroke. 2016 Dec;47(12):2923-2930. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014856. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005-2015.当前美国成年人吸烟状况 - 2005-2015 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(44):1205-1211. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2.
3
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
4
Carotid Artery Stenting-Historical Context, Trends, and Innovations.颈动脉支架置入术——历史背景、趋势与创新
Int J Angiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):205-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556842. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
5
Temporal trends in safety of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: systematic review.无症状患者颈动脉内膜切除术安全性的时间趋势:系统评价
Neurology. 2015 Jul 28;85(4):365-72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001781. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
6
Racial/Ethnic variation in carotid artery revascularization utilization and outcomes: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.颈动脉血管重建术的使用情况及治疗效果的种族/民族差异:来自国家心血管数据注册库的分析
Stroke. 2015 Jun;46(6):1525-32. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009013. Epub 2015 May 7.
7
Surgeon case volume and 30-day mortality after carotid endarterectomy among contemporary medicare beneficiaries: before and after national coverage determination for carotid artery stenting.当代医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉内膜切除术后外科医生的手术量与30天死亡率:在国家确定颈动脉支架置入术覆盖范围之前和之后
Stroke. 2015 May;46(5):1288-94. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006276. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
Outcomes after carotid artery stenting in Medicare beneficiaries, 2005 to 2009.2005 年至 2009 年 Medicare 受益人的颈动脉支架置入术治疗结果。
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Mar;72(3):276-86. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3638.
9
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial.支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状颈动脉狭窄的长期疗效:国际颈动脉支架置入术研究(ICSS)随机试验
Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):529-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
10
CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013.美国疾病控制与预防中心国家健康报告:2005 - 2013年美国发病和死亡的主要原因以及相关行为风险和保护因素
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27.

1999 - 2014年美国医疗保险人群中的颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术

Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.

作者信息

Lichtman Judith H, Jones Michael R, Leifheit Erica C, Sheffet Alice J, Howard George, Lal Brajesh K, Howard Virginia J, Wang Yun, Curtis Jeptha, Brott Thomas G

机构信息

Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.

Center for Neuroepidemiology and Clinical Neurological Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1035-1046. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12882.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.12882
PMID:28975306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5818799/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are the leading approaches to revascularization for carotid stenosis, yet contemporary data on trends in rates and outcomes are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To describe US national trends in performance and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and stenting among Medicare beneficiaries from 1999 to 2014.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial cross-sectional analysis of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older from 1999 to 2014 using the Medicare Inpatient and Denominator files. Spatial mixed models adjusted for age, sex, and race were fit to calculate county-specific risk-standardized revascularization rates. Mixed models were fit to assess trends in outcomes after adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, and symptomatic status.

EXPOSURES

Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Revascularization rates per 100 000 beneficiary-years of fee-for-service enrollment, in-hospital mortality, 30-day stroke or death, 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 1-year stroke.

RESULTS

During the study, 937 111 unique patients underwent carotid endarterectomy (mean age, 75.8 years; 43% women) and 231 077 underwent carotid artery stenting (mean age, 75.4 years; 49% women). There were 81 306 patients who underwent endarterectomy in 1999 and 36 325 in 2014; national rates per 100 000 beneficiary-years decreased from 298 in 1999-2000 to 128 in 2013-2014 (P < .001). The number of patients who underwent stenting ranged from 10 416 in 1999 to 22 865 in 2006 (an increase per 100 000 beneficiary-years from 40 in 1999-2000 to 75 in 2005-2006; P < .001); by 2014, there were 10 208 patients who underwent stenting and the rate decreased to 38 per 100 000 beneficiary-years (P < .001). Outcomes improved over time despite increases in vascular risk factors (eg, hypertension prevalence increased from 67% to 81% among patients who underwent endarterectomy and from 61% to 70% among patients who underwent stenting) and the proportion of symptomatic patients (all P < .001). There were adjusted annual decreases in 30-day ischemic stroke or death of 2.90% (95% CI, 2.63% to 3.18%) among patients who underwent endarterectomy and 1.13% (95% CI, 0.71% to 1.54%) among patients who underwent stenting; an absolute decrease from 1999 to 2014 was observed for endarterectomy (1.4%; 95% CI, 1.2% to 1.5%) but not stenting (-0.1%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 0.4%). Rates for 1-year ischemic stroke decreased after endarterectomy (absolute decrease, 3.5% [95% CI, 3.2% to 3.7%]; adjusted annual decrease, 2.17% [95% CI, 2.00% to 2.34%]) and stenting (absolute decrease, 1.6% [95% CI, 1.2% to 2.1%]; adjusted annual decrease, 1.86% [95% CI, 1.45%-2.26%]). Additional improvements were noted for in-hospital mortality, 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, and 30-day all-cause mortality as well as within demographic subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, the performance of carotid endarterectomy declined from 1999 to 2014, whereas the performance of carotid artery stenting increased until 2006 and then declined from 2007 to 2014. Outcomes improved despite increases in vascular risk factors.

摘要

重要性

颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术是治疗颈动脉狭窄的主要血管重建方法,但关于手术率和手术效果趋势的当代数据有限。

目的

描述1999年至2014年美国医疗保险受益人中颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术的手术情况及效果趋势。

设计、设置和参与者:利用医疗保险住院患者和分母文件,对1999年至2014年年龄在65岁及以上的医疗保险按服务付费受益人进行系列横断面分析。采用年龄、性别和种族调整的空间混合模型来计算特定县的风险标准化血管重建率。采用混合模型评估在调整人口统计学、合并症和症状状态后的手术效果趋势。

暴露因素

颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术。

主要结局和测量指标

每100,000受益年的按服务付费参保血管重建率、住院死亡率、30天卒中或死亡、30天卒中、心肌梗死或死亡、30天全因死亡率以及1年卒中。

结果

在研究期间,937,111例独特患者接受了颈动脉内膜切除术(平均年龄75.8岁;43%为女性),231,077例接受了颈动脉支架置入术(平均年龄75.4岁;49%为女性)。1999年有81,306例患者接受内膜切除术,2014年有36,325例;每100,000受益年的全国手术率从1999 - 2000年的298降至2013 - 2014年的128(P < 0.001)。接受支架置入术的患者数量从1999年的10,416例到2006年的22,865例(每100,000受益年从1999 - 2000年的40增加到2005 - 2006年的75;P < 0.001);到2014年,有10,208例患者接受支架置入术,手术率降至每100,000受益年38例(P < 0.001)。尽管血管危险因素增加(如接受内膜切除术的患者中高血压患病率从67%增至81%,接受支架置入术的患者中从61%增至70%)以及有症状患者比例增加(所有P < 0.001),但手术效果随时间有所改善。接受内膜切除术的患者30天缺血性卒中或死亡的调整后年下降率为2.90%(95%CI,2.63%至3.18%),接受支架置入术的患者为1.13%(95%CI,0.71%至1.54%);1999年至2014年观察到内膜切除术有绝对下降(1.4%;95%CI,1.2%至1.5%),而支架置入术无下降( - 0.1%;95%CI, - 0.5%至0.4%)。内膜切除术和支架置入术后1年缺血性卒中发生率均下降(内膜切除术绝对下降3.5% [95%CI,3.2%至3.7%];调整后年下降率2.17% [95%CI,2.00%至2.34%];支架置入术绝对下降1.6% [95%CI,1.2%至2.1%];调整后年下降率1.86% [95%CI, 1.45% - 2.26%])。住院死亡率、30天卒中、心肌梗死或死亡、30天全因死亡率以及在各人口统计学亚组中也有进一步改善。

结论与意义

在医疗保险按服务付费受益人中,1999年至2014年颈动脉内膜切除术的实施率下降,而颈动脉支架置入术的实施率在2006年前上升,2007年至2014年下降。尽管血管危险因素增加,但手术效果有所改善。