• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有症状的颈动脉狭窄:手术、支架置入还是药物治疗?

Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Surgery, Stenting, or Medical Therapy?

作者信息

Wabnitz Ashley M, Turan Tanya N

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, 19 Hagood Ave, Harborview Office Tower Suite 501, Charleston, SC, 29425-8050, USA.

出版信息

Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Aug;19(8):62. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0564-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11936-017-0564-0
PMID:28677035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5496976/
Abstract

Symptomatic carotid artery disease is a significant cause of ischemic stroke, and these patients are at high risk for recurrent vascular events. Patients with symptoms of stroke or transient ischemic attack attributable to a significantly stenotic vessel (70-99% luminal narrowing) should be treated with intensive medical therapy. Intensive medical therapy is a combination of pharmacologic and lifestyle interventions consistent with best-known practices as follows: initiation of antiplatelet agent or anticoagulation if medically indicated, high potency statin medication, blood pressure control with goal blood pressure of greater than 140/90, Mediterranean-style diet, exercise, and smoking cessation. Further, patients who have extracranial culprit lesions should be considered for revascularization with either carotid endarterectomy or carotid angioplasty and stenting depending on several factors including the patient's anatomy, age, gender, and procedural risk. Based on current evidence, patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis should be managed with intensive medical therapy, including the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for the first 90 days following the ischemic event. While the literature has shown a stronger benefit of revascularization of extracranial symptomatic disease among certain subgroups of patients with greater than 70% stenosis, there is less benefit from revascularization with endarterectomy in patients with moderate stenosis of 50-69% if the surgeon's risk of perioperative stroke or death rate is greater than 6%.

摘要

有症状的颈动脉疾病是缺血性中风的重要原因,这些患者发生复发性血管事件的风险很高。有因严重狭窄血管(管腔狭窄70 - 99%)导致的中风或短暂性脑缺血发作症状的患者,应接受强化药物治疗。强化药物治疗是药物和生活方式干预的组合,符合以下最知名的做法:根据医学指征启动抗血小板药物或抗凝治疗、使用高效他汀类药物、将血压控制在目标血压大于140/90、采用地中海式饮食、进行运动以及戒烟。此外,对于有颅外责任病变的患者,应根据包括患者解剖结构、年龄、性别和手术风险等多种因素,考虑采用颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术进行血运重建。根据目前的证据,有症状的颅内狭窄患者应采用强化药物治疗,包括在缺血事件后的前90天使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷进行双重抗血小板治疗。虽然文献表明,在某些管腔狭窄大于70%的亚组患者中,颅外有症状疾病的血运重建有更强的益处,但如果外科医生围手术期中风或死亡率大于6%,对于管腔中度狭窄50 - 69%的患者,内膜切除术血运重建的益处较小。

相似文献

1
Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Surgery, Stenting, or Medical Therapy?有症状的颈动脉狭窄:手术、支架置入还是药物治疗?
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Aug;19(8):62. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0564-0.
2
The diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis.无症状和有症状颈动脉狭窄患者的诊断与治疗
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2025 Jun;50(6):102992. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102992. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
3
Contemporary medical therapies of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease.动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉疾病的当代医学疗法。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;30(1):8-16. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
4
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting for Patients With Crescendo Transient Ischemic Attacks: A Systematic Review.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术治疗递增性短暂性脑缺血发作患者:系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Nov 1;154(11):1055-1063. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2952.
5
Large Artery Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease.大动脉粥样硬化性闭塞病
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2017 Feb;23(1, Cerebrovascular Disease):133-157. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000436.
6
Stroke prevention.中风预防。
Presse Med. 2016 Dec;45(12 Pt 2):e457-e471. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc Committee, American Heart Association.颈动脉内膜切除术指南。美国心脏协会特设委员会的多学科共识声明。
Stroke. 1995 Jan;26(1):188-201. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.1.188.
8
Carotid stenosis: endarterectomy or angioplasty and stenting?颈动脉狭窄:内膜切除术还是血管成形术和支架置入术?
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2007 Nov;9(6):451-62. doi: 10.1007/s11940-007-0046-x.
9
Carotid Endarterectomy With Simultaneous Proximal Common Carotid Endovascular Intervention is Beneficial for Symptomatic Stenosis and Likely Confers No Advantage for Asymptomatic Lesions.颈动脉内膜切除术联合近端颈总动脉血管内介入治疗对症状性狭窄有益,而对无症状病变可能没有优势。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Apr;58(3):263-279. doi: 10.1177/15385744231207014. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
10
Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy in Moderate to Severe Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.中重度无症状和有症状颈动脉狭窄的最佳抗血小板治疗:文献综述
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;57(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Ocular Structural and Vascular Changes in Patients with Severe Asymptomatic Carotid Disease After Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) and Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS).重度无症状性颈动脉疾病患者行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后的眼部结构和血管变化。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;15(14):1826. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141826.
2
Non-traditional lipid parameters are independent predictors of the location, distribution, and stroke events of moderate-to-severe intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.非传统脂质参数是中重度颅内和颅外动脉粥样硬化狭窄的部位、分布及卒中事件的独立预测因素。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 9;16:1564966. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1564966. eCollection 2025.
3
A Rare Presentation of an Ocular Ischemic Syndrome Complicated by Neovascular Glaucoma in a Patient With Mild Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Case Report.轻度颈动脉狭窄患者并发新生血管性青光眼的眼部缺血综合征罕见病例报告
Cureus. 2025 May 2;17(5):e83336. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83336. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Risk factors of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: long-term follow-up study.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的危险因素:长期随访研究
Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 8;15:1411045. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1411045. eCollection 2024.
5
Peri-Carotid Adipose Tissue and Atherosclerosis at Carotid Bifurcation.颈动脉周围脂肪组织与颈动脉分叉处的动脉粥样硬化
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Feb 11;11(2):58. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11020058.
6
Characteristics of the gut microbiota of patients with symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques positive for bacterial genetic material.有细菌遗传物质的症状性颈动脉粥样硬化斑块患者的肠道微生物组特征。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jan 12;13:1296554. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1296554. eCollection 2023.
7
B-mode ultrasound characteristics of carotid plaques in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with low-grade stenosis.低狭窄程度症状性和无症状性患者颈动脉斑块的 B 型超声特征。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0291450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291450. eCollection 2023.
8
Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Look Into the Diagnostic and Management Strategies, and Related Complications.颈动脉狭窄:诊断与管理策略及相关并发症探讨
Cureus. 2023 May 9;15(5):e38794. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38794. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Evaluation of ocular blood flow in the assessment of symptomatic carotid stenosis.症状性颈动脉狭窄评估中眼血流的评估
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Aug;31(4):475-481. doi: 10.1177/15910199231169844. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
10
Fluid structure interaction versus rigid-wall approach in the study of the symptomatic stenosed carotid artery: Importance of wall compliance and resilience of loose connective tissue.血流动力学与刚性壁面方法在症状性狭窄颈动脉研究中的比较:壁顺应性和疏松结缔组织弹性的重要性。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022 Aug;38(8):e3630. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3630. Epub 2022 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus aspirin in acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack of atherosclerotic origin: a subgroup analysis of SOCRATES, a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.替格瑞洛与阿司匹林在动脉粥样硬化性起源的急性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作中的疗效和安全性:SOCRATES 随机、双盲、对照试验的亚组分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Apr;16(4):301-310. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30038-8. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
2
Clinical Comparison of Outcomes of Early versus Delayed Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Cerebral Watershed Infarction due to Stenosis of the Proximal Internal Carotid Artery.颈内动脉近端狭窄所致症状性脑分水岭梗死早期与延迟颈动脉支架置入术结局的临床比较
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6241546. doi: 10.1155/2016/6241546. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
3
Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial.SAMMPRIS试验中危险因素控制与血管事件的关系。
Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):379-385. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003534. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
2016 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Non-Statin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.2016年美国心脏病学会临床专家共识文件特别工作组报告:非他汀类疗法在降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇以管理动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险中的作用专家共识决策路径
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 5;68(1):92-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.519. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis.颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的长期结果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1021-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505215. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Association between age and risk of stroke or death from carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting: a meta-analysis of pooled patient data from four randomised trials.年龄与颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术卒中和死亡风险的关系:四项随机试验汇总患者数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1305-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01309-4. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
7
Stroke risk with symptomatic carotid stenosis: The future is not what it used to be.有症状性颈动脉狭窄的中风风险:未来已非往昔。
Neurology. 2016 Feb 9;86(6):494-5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002363. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
Very Early Carotid Endarterectomy After Intravenous Thrombolysis.静脉溶栓后极早期颈动脉内膜切除术
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;51(4):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
9
Predictors of Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death within 30 Days of Carotid Artery Stenting: Results from the International Carotid Stenting Study.颈动脉支架置入术后30天内发生卒中、心肌梗死或死亡的预测因素:国际颈动脉支架置入研究结果
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;51(3):327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
10
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.