• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用经典与贝叶斯混合方法的优效性临床试验中,为确定样本量而选择治疗效果。

Selection of the treatment effect for sample size determination in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.

作者信息

Ciarleglio Maria M, Arendt Christopher D, Makuch Robert W, Peduzzi Peter N

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.

Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB, OH, United States.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:160-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.002
PMID:25583273
Abstract

Specification of the treatment effect that a clinical trial is designed to detect (θA) plays a critical role in sample size and power calculations. However, no formal method exists for using prior information to guide the choice of θA. This paper presents a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure for choosing an estimate of the treatment effect to be detected in a clinical trial that formally integrates prior information into this aspect of trial design. The value of θA is found that equates the pre-specified frequentist power and the conditional expected power of the trial. The conditional expected power averages the traditional frequentist power curve using the conditional prior distribution of the true unknown treatment effect θ as the averaging weight. The Bayesian prior distribution summarizes current knowledge of both the magnitude of the treatment effect and the strength of the prior information through the assumed spread of the distribution. By using a hybrid classical and Bayesian approach, we are able to formally integrate prior information on the uncertainty and variability of the treatment effect into the design of the study, mitigating the risk that the power calculation will be overly optimistic while maintaining a frequentist framework for the final analysis. The value of θA found using this method may be written as a function of the prior mean μ0 and standard deviation τ0, with a unique relationship for a given ratio of μ0/τ0. Results are presented for Normal, Uniform, and Gamma priors for θ.

摘要

临床试验旨在检测的治疗效果(θA)的设定在样本量和效能计算中起着关键作用。然而,目前尚无使用先验信息来指导θA选择的正式方法。本文提出了一种经典与贝叶斯混合的程序,用于选择在临床试验中要检测的治疗效果估计值,该程序将先验信息正式整合到试验设计的这一方面。发现θA的值使预先指定的频率论效能与试验的条件期望效能相等。条件期望效能使用真实未知治疗效果θ的条件先验分布作为平均权重,对传统的频率论效能曲线进行平均。贝叶斯先验分布通过假定分布的离散程度总结了治疗效果大小和先验信息强度的当前知识。通过使用经典与贝叶斯混合方法,我们能够将关于治疗效果不确定性和变异性的先验信息正式整合到研究设计中,降低效能计算过于乐观的风险,同时为最终分析保持频率论框架。使用此方法找到的θA值可以写成先验均值μ0和标准差τ0的函数,对于给定的μ0/τ0比率具有唯一关系。给出了θ的正态、均匀和伽马先验的结果。

相似文献

1
Selection of the treatment effect for sample size determination in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.在使用经典与贝叶斯混合方法的优效性临床试验中,为确定样本量而选择治疗效果。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:160-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
2
Selection of the effect size for sample size determination for a continuous response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.在使用经典与贝叶斯混合方法的优效性临床试验中,为连续反应确定样本量时效应量的选择。
Clin Trials. 2016 Jun;13(3):275-85. doi: 10.1177/1740774516628825. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.在采用经典与贝叶斯混合方法的优效性临床试验中,用于二元反应的样本量确定。
Trials. 2017 Feb 23;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1791-0.
4
Sample size re-estimation in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.使用混合经典和贝叶斯方法的优效性临床试验中的样本量重估。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1852-1878. doi: 10.1177/0962280218776991. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
5
Some thoughts on sample size: a Bayesian-frequentist hybrid approach.关于样本量的一些思考:贝叶斯-频率派混合方法。
Clin Trials. 2012 Oct;9(5):561-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774512453784. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
6
Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.基于二次损失函数的贝叶斯决策理论组序贯临床试验设计:频率学派评估
Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):5-14. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075764.
7
The choice of sample size: a mixed Bayesian / frequentist approach.样本量的选择:一种贝叶斯/频率论混合方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2009 Apr;18(2):183-94. doi: 10.1177/0962280208089298. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
8
Improving efficiency in the stepped-wedge trial design via Bayesian modeling with an informative prior for the time effects.通过贝叶斯建模,利用时间效应的信息先验,提高阶式楔形试验设计的效率。
Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;18(3):295-302. doi: 10.1177/1740774520980052. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
9
Empirical Bayes models of Poisson clinical trials and sample size determination.泊松临床试验的经验贝叶斯模型与样本量确定
Pharm Stat. 2010 Apr-Jun;9(2):133-41. doi: 10.1002/pst.383.
10
A Bayesian Power Analysis Procedure Considering Uncertainty in Effect Size Estimates from a Meta-analysis.一种考虑来自荟萃分析的效应量估计不确定性的贝叶斯功效分析程序。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;51(5):589-605. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1191324. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking Probability of Success as Bayes Utility.将成功概率重新思考为贝叶斯效用。
Biom J. 2025 Aug;67(4):e70067. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70067.
2
A Review of Bayesian Perspectives on Sample Size Derivation for Confirmatory Trials.关于确证性试验样本量推导的贝叶斯观点综述
Am Stat. 2021;75(4):424-432. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2021.1901782. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.在采用经典与贝叶斯混合方法的优效性临床试验中,用于二元反应的样本量确定。
Trials. 2017 Feb 23;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1791-0.