Boudreaux Edwin D, Waring Molly E, Hayes Rashelle B, Sadasivam Rajani S, Mullen Sean, Pagoto Sherry
Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, LA-189, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655 USA.
Division of Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases and Vulnerable Populations, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2014 Dec;4(4):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0293-9.
Mobile applications (apps) to improve health are proliferating, but before healthcare providers or organizations can recommend an app to the patients they serve, they need to be confident the app will be user-friendly and helpful for the target disease or behavior. This paper summarizes seven strategies for evaluating and selecting health-related apps: (1) Review the scientific literature, (2) Search app clearinghouse websites, (3) Search app stores, (4) Review app descriptions, user ratings, and reviews, (5) Conduct a social media query within professional and, if available, patient networks, (6) Pilot the apps, and (7) Elicit feedback from patients. The paper concludes with an illustrative case example. Because of the enormous range of quality among apps, strategies for evaluating them will be necessary for adoption to occur in a way that aligns with core values in healthcare, such as the Hippocratic principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence.
用于改善健康状况的移动应用程序(应用)正在激增,但在医疗保健提供者或机构向其服务的患者推荐应用之前,他们需要确信该应用对目标疾病或行为将是用户友好且有帮助的。本文总结了评估和选择与健康相关应用的七种策略:(1)查阅科学文献,(2)搜索应用信息交换中心网站,(3)搜索应用商店,(4)查看应用描述、用户评分和评论,(5)在专业网络以及(如有可能)患者网络内进行社交媒体查询,(6)试用这些应用,以及(7)征求患者的反馈。本文最后给出了一个示例案例。由于应用之间质量差异巨大,为了以符合医疗保健核心价值观(如希波克拉底的不伤害和行善原则)的方式采用这些应用,评估它们的策略将是必要的。