Bender Jacqueline Lorene, Yue Rossini Ying Kwan, To Matthew Jason, Deacken Laetitia, Jadad Alejandro R
ELLICSR Health, Wellness and Cancer Survivorship Centre, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 23;15(12):e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2661.
Mobile phones have become nearly ubiquitous, offering a promising means to deliver health interventions. However, little is known about smartphone applications (apps) for cancer.
The purpose of this study was to characterize the purpose and content of cancer-focused smartphone apps available for use by the general public and the evidence on their utility or effectiveness.
We conducted a systematic review of the official application stores for the four major smartphone platforms: iPhone, Android, Nokia, and BlackBerry. Apps were included in the review if they were focused on cancer and available for use by the general public. This was complemented by a systematic review of literature from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify evaluations of cancer-related smartphone apps.
A total of 295 apps from the smartphone app stores met the inclusion criteria. The majority of apps targeted breast cancer (46.8%, 138/295) or cancer in general (28.5%, 84/295). The reported app purpose was predominantly to raise awareness about cancer (32.2%, 95/295) or to provide educational information about cancer (26.4%, 78/295), followed by apps to support fundraising efforts (12.9%, 38/295), assist in early detection (11.5%, 34/295), promote a charitable organization (10.2%, 30/295), support disease management (3.7%, 11/295), cancer prevention (2.0%, 6/295), or social support (1.0%, 3/295). The majority of the apps did not describe their organizational affiliation (64.1%, 189/295). Apps affiliated with non-profit organizations were more likely to be free of cost (χ(2) 1=16.3, P<.001) and have a fundraising or awareness purpose (χ(2) 2=13.3, P=.001). The review of the health literature yielded 594 articles, none of which reported an evaluation of a cancer-focused smartphone application.
There are hundreds of cancer-focused apps with the potential to enhance efforts to promote behavior change, to monitor a host of symptoms and physiological indicators of disease, and to provide real-time supportive interventions, conveniently and at low cost. However, there is a lack of evidence on their utility, effectiveness, and safety. Future efforts should focus on improving and consolidating the evidence base into a whitelist for public consumption.
手机几乎无处不在,为提供健康干预措施提供了一种很有前景的手段。然而,对于针对癌症的智能手机应用程序(应用)却知之甚少。
本研究的目的是描述可供公众使用的、以癌症为重点的智能手机应用的目的和内容,以及关于其效用或有效性的证据。
我们对四大智能手机平台(iPhone、安卓、诺基亚和黑莓)的官方应用商店进行了系统评价。如果应用专注于癌症且可供公众使用,则纳入本评价。此外,我们还对MEDLINE、Embase和考科蓝图书馆的文献进行了系统评价,以确定对癌症相关智能手机应用的评估。
智能手机应用商店中的295款应用符合纳入标准。大多数应用针对乳腺癌(46.8%,138/295)或一般癌症(28.5%,84/295)。报告的应用目的主要是提高对癌症的认识(32.2%,95/295)或提供有关癌症的教育信息(26.4%,78/295),其次是支持筹款活动的应用(12.9%,38/295)、协助早期检测的应用(11.5%,34/295)、推广慈善组织的应用(10.2%,30/295)、支持疾病管理的应用(3.7%,11/295)、癌症预防的应用(2.0%,6/295)或社会支持的应用(1.0%,3/295)。大多数应用没有描述其组织隶属关系(64.1%,189/295)。与非营利组织相关的应用更有可能免费(χ²1=16.3,P<.001),并且具有筹款或提高认识的目的(χ²2=13.3,P=.001)。对健康文献的评价产生了594篇文章,其中没有一篇报告对以癌症为重点的智能手机应用的评估。
有数百款以癌症为重点且有潜力的应用,能加强促进行为改变的努力,监测一系列疾病症状和生理指标,并方便且低成本地提供实时支持性干预措施。然而,缺乏关于其效用、有效性和安全性的证据。未来的工作应集中于改进并将证据基础整合为一份供公众使用的白名单。