Drake John M, Kaul RajReni B, Alexander Laura W, O'Regan Suzanne M, Kramer Andrew M, Pulliam J Tomlin, Ferrari Matthew J, Park Andrew W
Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS Biol. 2015 Jan 13;13(1):e1002056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002056. eCollection 2015 Jan.
In 2014, a major epidemic of human Ebola virus disease emerged in West Africa, where human-to-human transmission has now been sustained for greater than 12 months. In the summer of 2014, there was great uncertainty about the answers to several key policy questions concerning the path to containment. What is the relative importance of nosocomial transmission compared with community-acquired infection? How much must hospital capacity increase to provide care for the anticipated patient burden? To which interventions will Ebola transmission be most responsive? What must be done to achieve containment? In recent years, epidemic models have been used to guide public health interventions. But, model-based policy relies on high quality causal understanding of transmission, including the availability of appropriate dynamic transmission models and reliable reporting about the sequence of case incidence for model fitting, which were lacking for this epidemic. To investigate the range of potential transmission scenarios, we developed a multi-type branching process model that incorporates key heterogeneities and time-varying parameters to reflect changing human behavior and deliberate interventions in Liberia. Ensembles of this model were evaluated at a set of parameters that were both epidemiologically plausible and capable of reproducing the observed trajectory. Results of this model suggested that epidemic outcome would depend on both hospital capacity and individual behavior. Simulations suggested that if hospital capacity was not increased, then transmission might outpace the rate of isolation and the ability to provide care for the ill, infectious, and dying. Similarly, the model suggested that containment would require individuals to adopt behaviors that increase the rates of case identification and isolation and secure burial of the deceased. As of mid-October, it was unclear that this epidemic would be contained even by 99% hospitalization at the planned hospital capacity. A new version of the model, updated to reflect information collected during October and November 2014, predicts a significantly more constrained set of possible futures. This model suggests that epidemic outcome still depends very heavily on individual behavior. Particularly, if future patient hospitalization rates return to background levels (estimated to be around 70%), then transmission is predicted to remain just below the critical point around Reff = 1. At the higher hospitalization rate of 85%, this model predicts near complete elimination in March to June, 2015.
2014年,西非爆发了大规模的人类埃博拉病毒病疫情,目前人与人之间的传播已持续超过12个月。2014年夏天,关于控制疫情途径的几个关键政策问题的答案存在很大不确定性。与社区获得性感染相比,医院内传播的相对重要性如何?医院容量必须增加多少才能为预期的患者负担提供护理?埃博拉病毒传播对哪些干预措施最敏感?为实现疫情控制必须采取什么措施?近年来,疫情模型已被用于指导公共卫生干预措施。但是,基于模型的政策依赖于对传播的高质量因果理解,包括合适的动态传播模型的可用性以及用于模型拟合的病例发病顺序的可靠报告,而此次疫情缺乏这些。为了研究潜在传播情景的范围,我们开发了一个多类型分支过程模型,该模型纳入了关键的异质性和随时间变化的参数,以反映利比里亚不断变化的人类行为和蓄意干预措施。在一组流行病学上合理且能够重现观察到的轨迹的参数下对该模型的集合进行了评估。该模型的结果表明,疫情结果将取决于医院容量和个人行为。模拟结果表明,如果医院容量不增加,那么传播速度可能超过隔离速度以及为患病、感染和垂死患者提供护理的能力。同样,该模型表明,控制疫情需要个人采取行为,提高病例识别和隔离率以及确保死者安全埋葬。截至10月中旬,尚不清楚即使按照计划的医院容量实现99%的住院率,此次疫情是否能够得到控制。一个更新版本的模型,更新后反映了2014年10月和1月期间收集的信息,预测了一组可能性明显更有限的未来情景。该模型表明,疫情结果仍然非常严重地依赖于个人行为。特别是,如果未来患者住院率恢复到背景水平(估计约为7%),那么预计传播将刚好低于有效繁殖数Reff = 1左右的临界点。在85%的较高住院率下,该模型预测在2015年3月至6月几乎完全消除疫情。