Gadomski Anne M, Fothergill Kate E, Larson Susan, Wissow Lawrence S, Winegrad Heather, Nagykaldi Zsolt J, Olson Ardis L, Roter Debra L
Bassett Research Institute, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, New York.
Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Mar;56(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.011. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
To evaluate how a comprehensive, computerized, self-administered adolescent screener, the DartScreen, affects within-visit patient-doctor interactions such as data gathering, advice giving, counseling, and discussion of mental health issues.
Patient-doctor interaction was compared between visits without screening and those with the DartScreen completed before the visit. Teens, aged 15-19 years scheduled for an annual visit, were recruited at one urban and one rural pediatric primary care clinic. The doctor acted as his/her own control, first using his/her usual routine for five to six adolescent annual visits. Then, the DartScreen was introduced for five visits where at the beginning of the visit, the doctor received a summary report of the screening results. All visits were audio recorded and analyzed using the Roter interaction analysis system. Doctor and teen dialogue and topics discussed were compared between the two groups.
Seven midcareer doctors and 72 adolescents participated; 37 visits without DartScreen and 35 with DartScreen were audio recorded. The Roter interaction analysis system defined medically related data gathering (mean, 36.8 vs. 32.7 statements; p = .03) and counseling (mean, 36.8 vs. 32.7 statements; p = .01) decreased with DartScreen; however, doctor responsiveness and engagement improved with DartScreen (mean, 4.8 vs. 5.1 statements; p = .00). Teens completing the DartScreen offered more psychosocial information (mean, 18.5 vs. 10.6 statements; p = .01), and mental health was discussed more after the DartScreen (mean, 93.7 vs. 43.5 statements; p = .03). Discussion of somatic and substance abuse topics did not change. Doctors reported that screening improved visit organization and efficiency.
Use of the screener increased discussion of mental health but not at the expense of other adolescent health topics.
评估一种全面的、计算机化的、青少年自我管理筛查工具DartScreen如何影响就诊期间的医患互动,如数据收集、建议提供、咨询以及心理健康问题的讨论。
比较未进行筛查的就诊与就诊前完成DartScreen筛查的就诊之间的医患互动情况。招募了计划进行年度就诊的15至19岁青少年,分别来自一家城市儿科初级保健诊所和一家农村儿科初级保健诊所。医生以自身作为对照,首先在五到六次青少年年度就诊中采用其常规流程。然后,引入DartScreen进行五次就诊,在就诊开始时,医生会收到筛查结果的总结报告。所有就诊均进行音频录制,并使用罗特互动分析系统进行分析。比较两组之间医生与青少年的对话及讨论的话题。
七名处于职业生涯中期的医生和72名青少年参与了研究;录制了37次未使用DartScreen的就诊和35次使用DartScreen的就诊的音频。罗特互动分析系统表明,使用DartScreen后,与医疗相关的数据收集(平均陈述数分别为36.8条和32.7条;p = 0.03)和咨询(平均陈述数分别为36.8条和32.7条;p = 0.01)减少;然而,使用DartScreen后医生的反应能力和参与度有所提高(平均陈述数分别为4.8条和5.1条;p = 0.00)。完成DartScreen筛查的青少年提供了更多的心理社会信息(平均陈述数分别为18.5条和10.6条;p = 0.01),并且在使用DartScreen后对心理健康的讨论更多(平均陈述数分别为93.7条和43.5条;p = 0.03)。关于躯体和药物滥用话题的讨论没有变化。医生报告称,筛查改善了就诊的组织和效率。
使用该筛查工具增加了对心理健康的讨论,但并未以牺牲其他青少年健康话题为代价。