Hornberger J, Thom D, MaCurdy T
Department of Health Research & Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305-90521, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Oct;12(10):597-606. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07119.x.
To determine if a self-administered previsit questionnaire designed to increase awareness of patients' concerns alters the visit duration, content of the discussion, and patient and physician satisfaction.
A balanced, two-arm trial in which physicians were randomized.
Two primary-care clinics affiliated with a university hospital.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Ten physicians and 201 continuity-care patients.
In intervention visits, patients completed a previsit questionnaire asking about the desire for medical information, psychosocial assistance, therapeutic listening, general health advice, and biomedical treatment. Physicians reviewed questionnaires with patients during the visit.
We used audiotapes of encounters to quantify the duration of the encounter and measured the number and type of diagnoses discussed in the visit, and patient and physician satisfaction with the encounter. Intervention visits were 34% longer (increase of 6.8 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4, 13.2) than control visits with most of the additional time spent in discussion of biomedical diagnoses (3.35 minutes; 95% CI 0.00, 6.72) and in the performance of the physical examination (2.7 minutes; 95% CI 0.5, 4.9). The number of diagnoses discussed per visit was 30% higher in intervention visits (increase of 1.7 diagnoses per visit; 95% CI 0.3, 3.2), but patients' satisfaction with these visits tended to be lower.
Using a previsit questionnaire to increase awareness of the patients' concerns may entail a trade-off between conflicting goals: trying to respond to patient concerns while not significantly increasing the cost per visit. A future challenge is to develop and refine techniques with sufficient efficacy to justify the expense of implementing the intervention and the longer visit needed to respond adequately to patients' concerns.
确定一份旨在提高患者关注度的就诊前自我管理问卷是否会改变就诊时长、讨论内容以及患者和医生的满意度。
一项平衡的双臂试验,医生被随机分组。
一家大学医院附属的两家初级保健诊所。
患者/参与者:10名医生和201名连续性护理患者。
在干预就诊中,患者完成一份就诊前问卷,询问对医疗信息、心理社会支持、治疗性倾听、一般健康建议和生物医学治疗的需求。医生在就诊期间与患者一起查看问卷。
我们使用就诊录音来量化就诊时长,并统计就诊中讨论的诊断数量和类型,以及患者和医生对就诊的满意度。干预就诊比对照就诊长34%(增加6.8分钟;95%置信区间[CI]0.4,13.2),大部分额外时间用于讨论生物医学诊断(3.35分钟;95%CI 0.00,6.72)和进行体格检查(2.7分钟;95%CI 0.5,4.9)。干预就诊每次讨论的诊断数量高30%(每次就诊增加1.7个诊断;95%CI 0.3,3.2),但患者对这些就诊的满意度往往较低。
使用就诊前问卷来提高对患者关注点的认识可能需要在相互冲突的目标之间进行权衡:既要努力回应患者的关注点,又不能显著增加每次就诊的成本。未来的挑战是开发和完善具有足够疗效的技术,以证明实施干预的费用以及为充分回应患者关注点所需的更长就诊时间是合理的。