Suppr超能文献

[通过超声检查从不同部位测量下腔静脉在纵切面上的直径及变异性:一项比较研究]

[Inferior vena cava diameter and variability on longitudinal plane measured through ultrasonography from different sites: a comparison study].

作者信息

Zhang Qing, Liu Dawei, Wang Xiaoting, Zhang Hongmin, He Huaiwu, Chao Yangong, Wang Chunxian

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China. Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;53(11):880-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the inferior vena cava internal diameter (IVCID) and inferior vena cava variability (IVCV) on longitudinal plane measured from subcostal area and right mid-axillary line through ultrasonography and to find out if the measuring site and different respiratory status were related to the IVCID and IVCV.

METHODS

A total of 127 patients were enrolled successively in Critical Care Medical Department of Peking Union Medical Hospital from November to December, 2013. IVCID and IVCV of patients on mechanical ventilation or with spontaneous breathing were measured longitudinally from subcostal area and right mid-axillary line.

RESULTS

(1) Totally 124 out of the 127 patients achieved measurement from right mid-axillary line, while only 83 patients achieved measurement from subcostal area. The difference was statistically significant (χ(2) = 74.42, P < 0.01) . Eighty-one patients can be measured from both sites, with 44 had spontaneous breathing and 37 on mechanical ventilation. (2)Whether in spontaneous or mechanically ventilated patients, IVCID measured from subcostal area was statistically different from right mid-axillary line measurement at both end expiration and end inspiration. (3) In mechanically ventilated patients with IVCID ≥ 2 cm measured from subcostal area at end expiration, no statistical difference was found between the IVCID from right mid-axillary line and from subcostal area[ (2.25 ± 0.32) cm vs (2.10 ± 0.12) cm, P = 0.083]. In spontaneous breathing patients with IVCID ≥ 2 cm measured from subcostal area at end expiration, there were significant differences between the IVCID from right mid-axillary line and from subcostal area at both end expiration and end inspiration. The IVCV between the two sites were also statistically different. In mechanically ventilated patients with IVCID ≤ 1.5 cm measured from subcostal area at end expiration, there were significant difference between the IVCID from right mid-axillary line and from subcostal area [ (1.58 ± 0.43) cm vs (1.09 ± 0.38) cm, P = 0.026]. In spontaneous breathing patients with IVCID ≤ 1.5 cm measured from subcostal area at end expiration, there were significant difference between the IVCID from right mid-axillary line and from subcostal area at both end expiration and end inspiration. The IVCV between the two sites were also statistically different. (4) Correlation analysis showed in mechanically ventilated patients, IVCID measured from right mid-axillary line at end expiration was correlated with the IVCID measured from subcostal area at end expiration(r = 0.565, P = 0.000). In spontaneous breathing patients, IVCID measured at end expiration from right mid-axillary line was correlated with the IVCID measured from subcostal area (r = 0.526, P = 0.000) . IVCID measured at end inspiration from right mid-axillary line was correlated with the IVCID measured from subcostal area (r = 0.454, P = 0.002). IVCV measured from right mid-axillary line was correlated with IVCV measured from subcostal area (r = 0.513, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior vena cava internal diameter and variability measured longitudinally through ultrasonography from subcostal area is different with measurements from right mid-axillary line. Measurements from the two sites are not replaceable with each other. Further studies are needed before the clinical use of inferior vena cava internal diameter and variability measured from right mid-axillary line.

摘要

目的

通过超声检查测量肋下区域和右腋中线纵切面上的下腔静脉内径(IVCID)及下腔静脉变异度(IVCV),探讨测量部位及不同呼吸状态与IVCID和IVCV的关系。

方法

2013年11月至12月,北京协和医院重症医学科连续纳入127例患者。对机械通气或自主呼吸患者,从肋下区域和右腋中线纵切面上测量IVCID和IVCV。

结果

(1)127例患者中,124例成功从右腋中线测量,仅83例成功从肋下区域测量,差异有统计学意义(χ(2)=74.42,P<0.01)。81例患者可从两个部位测量,其中44例自主呼吸,37例机械通气。(2)无论是自主呼吸还是机械通气患者,在呼气末和吸气末,肋下区域测量的IVCID与右腋中线测量的IVCID均有统计学差异。(3)呼气末肋下区域测量IVCID≥2 cm的机械通气患者,右腋中线与肋下区域测量的IVCID无统计学差异[(2.25±0.32)cm比(2.10±0.12)cm,P=0.083]。呼气末肋下区域测量IVCID≥2 cm的自主呼吸患者,呼气末和吸气末右腋中线与肋下区域测量的IVCID均有显著差异,两个部位的IVCV也有统计学差异。呼气末肋下区域测量IVCID≤1.5 cm的机械通气患者,右腋中线与肋下区域测量的IVCID有显著差异[(1.58±0.43)cm比(1.09±0.38)cm,P=0.026]。呼气末肋下区域测量IVCID≤1.5 cm的自主呼吸患者,呼气末和吸气末右腋中线与肋下区域测量的IVCID均有显著差异,两个部位的IVCV也有统计学差异。(4)相关性分析显示,机械通气患者中,呼气末右腋中线测量的IVCID与肋下区域测量的IVCID相关(r=0.565,P=0.000)。自主呼吸患者中,呼气末右腋中线测量的IVCID与肋下区域测量的IVCID相关(r=0.526,P=0.000)。吸气末右腋中线测量的IVCID与肋下区域测量的IVCID相关(r=0.454,P=0.002)。右腋中线测量的IVCV与肋下区域测量的IVCV相关(r=0.513,P=0.000)。

结论

超声检查从肋下区域纵切面上测量的下腔静脉内径及变异度与右腋中线测量结果不同,两个部位测量结果不可相互替代。右腋中线测量的下腔静脉内径及变异度在临床应用前尚需进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验