Tennekoon Vidhura, Rosenman Robert
Department of Economics, Indiana University Purdue University, School of Liberal Arts, 425 University Boulevard, Cavanaugh Hall, Room 524, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Appl Econ. 2015 Jan;47(5):431-448. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2014.972546.
Researchers often use the discrepancy between self-reported and biochemically assessed active smoking status to argue that self-reported smoking status is not reliable, ignoring the limitations of biochemically assessed measures and treating it as the gold standard in their comparisons. Here, we employ econometric techniques to compare the accuracy of self-reported and biochemically assessed current tobacco use, taking into account measurement errors with both methods. Our approach allows estimating and comparing the sensitivity and specificity of each measure without directly observing true smoking status. The results, robust to several alternative specifications, suggest that there is no clear reason to think that one measure dominates the other in accuracy.
研究人员经常利用自我报告的吸烟状态与生化评估的当前吸烟状态之间的差异,来论证自我报告的吸烟状态不可靠,却忽略了生化评估方法的局限性,并在比较中将其视为金标准。在此,我们运用计量经济学技术,在考虑两种方法测量误差的情况下,比较自我报告和生化评估的当前烟草使用情况的准确性。我们的方法能够在不直接观察真实吸烟状态的情况下,估计并比较每种测量方法的敏感性和特异性。结果在几种替代设定下都很稳健,表明没有明确理由认为一种测量方法在准确性上优于另一种。