• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进展如何:两分钟步行测试能否预测下肢截肢者的六分钟步行测试结果?

Going places: Does the two-minute walk test predict the six-minute walk test in lower extremity amputees?

作者信息

Reid Lauren, Thomson Penny, Besemann Markus, Dudek Nancy

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa, K1H 8M2 Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2015 Mar;47(3):256-61. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1916.

DOI:10.2340/16501977-1916
PMID:25588644
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assessing a patient's ability to walk the distance required for community ambulation (at least 300 m) is important in amputee rehabilitation. During the 2-min walk test, most amputees cannot walk 300 m. Thus, the 6-min walk test may be preferred, but it has not been fully validated in this population. This study examined the convergent and discriminative validity of the 6-min walk test and assessed whether the 2-min test could predict the results of the 6-min test.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients with unilateral or bilateral amputations at the Syme, transtibial, knee disarticulation or transfemoral level completed the 6-min walk test, 2-min walk test, Timed Up and Go test, Locomotor Capabilities Index version 5, Houghton Scale of Prosthetic Use, and Activity-Specific Balance Confidence scale.

RESULTS

The 6-min walk test correlated with the other tests (R = 0.57-0.95), demonstrating convergent validity. It demonstrated discriminative validity with respect to age, aetiology of amputation, and K-level (p < 0.0001). The 2-min walk test was highly predictive of the 6-min walk test distance (R2 = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The 6-min walk test is a valid measure of amputee ambulation. However, the results suggest that it may not be necessary, since the 2-min walk test strongly predicts the 6-min walk test. Clinicians could therefore save time by using the shorter test.

摘要

目的

评估患者行走社区活动所需距离(至少300米)的能力在截肢者康复中很重要。在2分钟步行测试中,大多数截肢者无法行走300米。因此,6分钟步行测试可能更受青睐,但尚未在该人群中得到充分验证。本研究检验了6分钟步行测试的收敛效度和区分效度,并评估2分钟测试是否能预测6分钟测试的结果。

方法

共有86例在Syme、经胫骨、膝关节离断或经股骨水平进行单侧或双侧截肢的患者完成了6分钟步行测试、2分钟步行测试、定时起立行走测试、运动能力指数第5版、假肢使用霍顿量表和特定活动平衡信心量表。

结果

6分钟步行测试与其他测试相关(R = 0.57 - 0.95),表明具有收敛效度。在年龄、截肢病因和K级方面显示出区分效度(p < 0.0001)。2分钟步行测试对6分钟步行测试距离具有高度预测性(R2 = 0.91)。

结论

6分钟步行测试是评估截肢者行走能力的有效指标。然而,结果表明可能没有必要,因为2分钟步行测试能强烈预测6分钟步行测试。因此,临床医生使用较短的测试可以节省时间。

相似文献

1
Going places: Does the two-minute walk test predict the six-minute walk test in lower extremity amputees?进展如何:两分钟步行测试能否预测下肢截肢者的六分钟步行测试结果?
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Mar;47(3):256-61. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1916.
2
Assessing mobility for persons with lower limb amputation: the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test with the inclusion of two novel conditions.评估下肢截肢患者的活动能力:八宇步行测试,包括两种新的情况。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 May;43(9):1323-1332. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1662495. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
3
The Utility of the 2-Minute Walk Test as a Measure of Mobility in People With Lower Limb Amputation.两分钟步行试验在下肢截肢患者移动能力测量中的效用。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1183-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
4
Temporal Spatial and Metabolic Measures of Walking in Highly Functional Individuals With Lower Limb Amputations.下肢截肢的高功能个体行走的时空与代谢指标
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jul;98(7):1389-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.09.134. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
5
Quality of life and functionality after lower limb amputations: comparison between uni- vs. bilateral amputee patients.下肢截肢术后的生活质量和功能:单侧与双侧截肢患者的比较。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013 Feb;37(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/0309364612438795. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
6
Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the walking questionnaire in people with a lower limb amputation.下肢截肢患者行走问卷的结构效度和重测信度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):983-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.030. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
7
Use of the Houghton Scale to Classify Community and Household Walking Ability in People With Lower-Limb Amputation: Criterion-Related Validity.使用霍顿量表对下肢截肢者的社区和家庭步行能力进行分类:与标准相关的效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
8
The Component Timed-Up-and-Go test: the utility and psychometric properties of using a mobile application to determine prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputations.组件计时起立行走测试:使用移动应用程序确定下肢截肢者假肢活动能力的效用和心理测量特性。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Mar;32(3):388-397. doi: 10.1177/0269215517728324. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
Metabolic energy expenditure of ambulation in lower extremity amputees: what have we learned and what are the next steps?下肢截肢者行走时的代谢能量消耗:我们学到了什么,下一步是什么?
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jan;39(2):143-151. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1095948. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
10
The benefits of using a vacuum-assisted socket system to improve balance and gait in elderly transtibial amputees.使用真空辅助接受腔系统改善老年胫骨截肢者平衡和步态的益处。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016 Feb;40(1):83-8. doi: 10.1177/0309364614546927. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
High-level activity and access to sport following lower limb amputation due to malignant musculoskeletal tumors versus trauma: a prospective comparative study.因恶性肌肉骨骼肿瘤与创伤导致下肢截肢后的高水平活动及运动参与情况:一项前瞻性比较研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 21;145(1):418. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06037-x.
2
Enhancing the effects of nusinersen with cybernic treatment using Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) in spinal muscular atrophy: a real-world case series and exploratory cohort analysis.使用混合辅助肢体(HAL)的控制论治疗增强脊髓性肌萎缩症中诺西那生的疗效:一项真实世界病例系列和探索性队列分析
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Apr 23;20(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03681-9.
3
Exploring the Effect of Preamputation Employment and Income on Ambulation in Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputees After Amputee Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
探索截肢前就业和收入对血管性下肢截肢患者截肢康复后行走能力的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024 Jul 23;6(3):100359. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100359. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Cognitive load in individuals with a transfemoral amputation during single- and dual-task walking: a pilot study of brain activity in people using a socket prosthesis or a bone-anchored prosthesis.穿戴socket 假肢或骨锚式假肢的个体在单任务和双任务行走时的认知负荷:一项关于脑活动的初步研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug 22;56:jrm40111. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40111.
5
Functional and perceptive differences between conventional and advanced ankle foot orthoses in community ambulators post-limb trauma: the injuries managed with advanced bracing of the lower extremity (IM ABLE) study.肢体创伤后社区行走者使用传统与先进踝足矫形器的功能和感知差异:下肢先进支具治疗损伤(IM ABLE)研究
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jul 1;5:1277509. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1277509. eCollection 2024.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of The Nepali Version of The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility Short-Form (Plus-M™/Nepali-12Sf) In Lower Limb Prosthesis Users.下肢假肢使用者中《假肢使用者移动性简表尼泊尔语版(Plus-M™/尼泊尔语-12Sf)》的跨文化适应与验证
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2023 Aug 23;6(1):41310. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.41310. eCollection 2023.
7
Normative values in healthy adults for the 6-minute and 2-minute walk tests in Belgium and Vietnam: implications for clinical practice.健康成年人在比利时和越南的 6 分钟和 2 分钟步行测试的正常值:对临床实践的影响。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Mar 19;56:jrm18628. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.18628.
8
Returning to work after dysvascular lower limb amputation-A novel multivariate approach to examine relative contributions of biopsychosocial predictors.下肢血管性截肢后重返工作岗位——一种检验生物心理社会预测因素相对贡献的新型多变量方法。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2025 Feb 1;49(1):30-37. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000322. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
9
Walking speeds are lower for short distance and turning locomotion: Experiments and modeling in low-cost prosthesis users.短距离和转向运动时的行走速度较低:低成本假肢使用者的实验和建模。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0295993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295993. eCollection 2024.
10
Estimation of body segmental orientation for prosthetic gait using a nonlinear autoregressive neural network with exogenous inputs.使用具有外部输入的非线性自回归神经网络估计假肢步态的身体节段方向。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Dec;46(4):1723-1739. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01332-6. Epub 2023 Oct 23.