Capotosto Paolo, Spadone Sara, Tosoni Annalisa, Sestieri Carlo, Romani Gian Luca, Della Penna Stefania, Corbetta Maurizio
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, and Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti, Italy, and
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, and Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University G. D'Annunzio, 66100 Chieti, Italy, and.
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 14;35(2):721-30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2066-14.2015.
Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we have recently shown a functional anatomical distinction in human parietal cortex between regions involved in maintaining attention to a location [ventral intraparietal sulcus (vIPS)] and a region involved in shifting attention between locations [medial superior parietal lobule (mSPL)]. In particular, while rTMS interference over vIPS impaired target discrimination at contralateral attended locations, interference over mSPL affected performance following shifts of attention regardless of the visual field (Capotosto et al., 2013). Here, using rTMS interference in conjunction with EEG recordings of brain rhythms during the presentation of cues that indicate to either shift or maintain spatial attention, we tested whether this functional anatomical segregation involves different mechanisms of rhythm synchronization. The transient inactivation of vIPS reduced the amplitude of the expected parieto-occipital low-α (8-10 Hz) desynchronization contralateral to the cued location. Conversely, the transient inactivation of mSPL, compared with vIPS, reduced the high-α (10-12 Hz) desynchronization induced by shifting attention into both visual fields. Furthermore, rTMS induced a frequency-specific delay of task-related modulation of brain rhythms. Specifically, rTMS over vIPS or mSPL during maintenance (stay cues) or shifting (shift cues) of spatial attention, respectively, caused a delay of α parieto-occipital desynchronization. Moreover, rTMS over vIPS during stay cues caused a delay of δ (2-4 Hz) frontocentral synchronization. These findings further support the anatomo-functional subdivision of the dorsal attention network in subsystems devoted to shifting or maintaining covert visuospatial attention and indicate that these mechanisms operate in different frequency channels linking frontal to parieto-occipital visual regions.
我们最近利用重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)发现,人类顶叶皮质中,参与维持对某一位置的注意力的区域[腹侧顶内沟(vIPS)]与参与在不同位置间转移注意力的区域[内侧顶上小叶(mSPL)]在功能解剖上存在差异。具体而言,对vIPS进行rTMS干扰会损害对侧被关注位置的目标辨别能力,而对mSPL进行干扰则会影响注意力转移后的表现,且与视野无关(卡波托斯托等人,2013年)。在此,我们结合rTMS干扰与提示空间注意力转移或维持时的脑电节律记录,测试了这种功能解剖学上的分离是否涉及不同的节律同步机制。vIPS的短暂失活降低了与提示位置对侧的预期顶枕低α(8 - 10赫兹)去同步化的幅度。相反,与vIPS相比,mSPL的短暂失活降低了因注意力转移到两个视野而诱发的高α(10 - 12赫兹)去同步化。此外,rTMS诱导了与任务相关的脑电节律调制的频率特异性延迟。具体来说,在空间注意力维持(停留提示)或转移(转移提示)期间,分别对vIPS或mSPL进行rTMS会导致α顶枕去同步化延迟。此外,在停留提示期间对vIPS进行rTMS会导致δ(2 - 4赫兹)额中央同步延迟。这些发现进一步支持了背侧注意力网络在致力于转移或维持隐蔽视觉空间注意力的子系统中的解剖功能细分,并表明这些机制在连接额叶与顶枕视觉区域的不同频率通道中起作用。