Lee Joy L, DeCamp Matthew, Dredze Mark, Chisolm Margaret S, Berger Zackary D
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 15;16(10):e237. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3765.
Twitter is home to many health professionals who send messages about a variety of health-related topics. Amid concerns about physicians posting inappropriate content online, more in-depth knowledge about these messages is needed to understand health professionals' behavior on Twitter.
Our goal was to characterize the content of Twitter messages, specifically focusing on health professionals and their tweets relating to health.
We performed an in-depth content analysis of 700 tweets. Qualitative content analysis was conducted on tweets by health users on Twitter. The primary objective was to describe the general type of content (ie, health-related versus non-health related) on Twitter authored by health professionals and further to describe health-related tweets on the basis of the type of statement made. Specific attention was given to whether a tweet was personal (as opposed to professional) or made a claim that users would expect to be supported by some level of medical evidence (ie, a "testable" claim). A secondary objective was to compare content types among different users, including patients, physicians, nurses, health care organizations, and others.
Health-related users are posting a wide range of content on Twitter. Among health-related tweets, 53.2% (184/346) contained a testable claim. Of health-related tweets by providers, 17.6% (61/346) were personal in nature; 61% (59/96) made testable statements. While organizations and businesses use Twitter to promote their services and products, patient advocates are using this tool to share their personal experiences with health.
Twitter users in health-related fields tweet about both testable claims and personal experiences. Future work should assess the relationship between testable tweets and the actual level of evidence supporting them, including how Twitter users-especially patients-interpret the content of tweets posted by health providers.
推特上有许多健康专业人士,他们会发布各种与健康相关主题的信息。鉴于人们担心医生在网上发布不当内容,需要更深入了解这些信息,以理解健康专业人士在推特上的行为。
我们的目标是描述推特信息的内容,特别关注健康专业人士及其与健康相关的推文。
我们对700条推文进行了深入的内容分析。对推特上健康用户的推文进行了定性内容分析。主要目的是描述健康专业人士在推特上发布的一般内容类型(即与健康相关的内容与非健康相关的内容),并进一步根据所做陈述的类型描述与健康相关的推文。特别关注一条推文是否是个人性质的(与专业性质相对),或者是否提出了用户期望能得到某种医学证据支持的主张(即“可检验的”主张)。次要目的是比较不同用户(包括患者、医生、护士、医疗保健组织及其他用户)之间的内容类型。
与健康相关的用户在推特上发布的内容广泛。在与健康相关的推文中,53.2%(184/346)包含可检验的主张。在提供者发布的与健康相关的推文中,17.6%(61/346)本质上是个人性质的;61%(59/96)做出了可检验的陈述。虽然组织和企业利用推特来推广他们的服务和产品,但患者权益倡导者正在利用这个工具分享他们的个人健康经历。
健康相关领域的推特用户会发布可检验的主张和个人经历。未来的工作应该评估可检验的推文与支持它们的实际证据水平之间的关系,包括推特用户(尤其是患者)如何解读健康提供者发布的推文内容。