Department of Public Health, 10695California State University Sacramento, USA.
Lyndon B Johnson School of Public Affairs, 49177The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2022 Apr;32(5):788-799. doi: 10.1177/10497323221077296. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
State-level restrictions on abortion access may prompt greater numbers of people to self-manage their abortion. The few studies exploring perspectives of providers towards self-managed abortion are focused on physicians and advanced practice clinicians. Little is known about the wider spectrum of abortion care providers who encounter self-managed abortion in their clinic-based work. To gain a deeper understanding of this issue and inform future care delivery, we conducted in-depth interviews with 46 individuals working in a range of positions in 46 abortion clinics across 29 states. Our interpretative analysis resulted in themes shaped by beliefs about safety and autonomy, and a tension between the two: that self-managed abortion is too great a risk, that people are capable of self-managing an abortion, and that people have a right to a self-managed abortion. Our findings highlight the importance of increasing knowledge and clarifying values among all abortion care providers, including clinic staff.
州级层面的堕胎准入限制可能会促使更多人自行堕胎。少数研究堕胎提供者对自行堕胎看法的研究主要集中在医生和高级执业临床医生。对于在其诊所工作中遇到自行堕胎的更广泛的堕胎护理提供者,人们知之甚少。为了更深入地了解这个问题并为未来的护理提供信息,我们对 29 个州的 46 家堕胎诊所的 46 名从事各种职位的人进行了深入访谈。我们的解释性分析产生了以对安全和自主权的信念为特征的主题,以及两者之间的紧张关系:即自行堕胎风险太大,人们有能力自行堕胎,以及人们有权进行自行堕胎。我们的研究结果强调了增加所有堕胎护理提供者(包括诊所工作人员)的知识和澄清价值观的重要性。