Suppr超能文献

米非司酮(RU-486)作为附表 IV 受控药物-对妇女保健误导性药物政策的影响。

Mifepristone (RU-486) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug-Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women's Health Care.

机构信息

Department of Social Work, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.

College of Law, National Chung-Cheng University, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148363.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mifepristone (RU-486) has been approved for abortion in Taiwan since 2000. Mifepristone was the first non-addictive medicine to be classified as a schedule IV controlled drug. As a case of the "misuse" of "misuse of drugs laws," the policy and consequences of mifepristone-assisted abortion for pregnant women could be compared with those of illicit drug use for drug addicts.

METHODS

The rule-making process of mifepristone regulation was analyzed from various aspects of legitimacy, social stigma, women's human rights, and access to health care.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The restriction policy on mifepristone regulation in Taiwan has raised concerns over the legitimacy of listing a non-addictive substance as a controlled drug, which may produce stigma and negatively affect women's reproductive and privacy rights. Such a restriction policy and social stigma may lead to the unwillingness of pregnant women to utilize safe abortion services. Under the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, the US FDA's action on mifepristone prescription and dispensing reminds us it is time to consider a change of policy.

CONCLUSIONS

Listing mifepristone as a controlled drug could impede the acceptability and accessibility of safe mifepristone use and violates women's right to health care.

摘要

背景

米非司酮(RU-486)自 2000 年起在台湾获准用于堕胎。米非司酮是第一种被归类为第四附表管制药物的非成瘾性药物。作为“滥用毒品法”的“滥用”案例,米非司酮辅助堕胎的政策和后果可以与吸毒者非法使用毒品进行比较。

方法

从合法性、社会耻辱感、妇女人权和获得医疗保健等方面分析了米非司酮监管的制定过程。

结果与讨论

台湾对米非司酮管制的限制政策引起了人们对将非成瘾物质列为管制药物的合法性的关注,这可能会产生耻辱感,并对妇女的生殖和隐私权产生负面影响。这种限制政策和社会耻辱感可能导致孕妇不愿意使用安全的堕胎服务。在 COVID-19 大流行的威胁下,美国 FDA 对米非司酮处方和配药的行动提醒我们,是时候考虑改变政策了。

结论

将米非司酮列为管制药物可能会阻碍安全使用米非司酮的可接受性和可及性,并侵犯妇女的医疗保健权利。

相似文献

1
Mifepristone (RU-486) as a Schedule IV Controlled Drug-Implications for a Misleading Drug Policy on Women's Health Care.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148363.
2
RU 486, mifepristone: a review of a controversial drug.
Nurse Pract. 1994 Jun;19(6):59-61. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199406000-00014.
3
A woman's choice.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Apr;44(2):88-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00190.x.
4
Pregnancy interruption using mifepristone (RU-486). A new choice for women in the USA.
J Nurse Midwifery. 1997 Mar-Apr;42(2):86-90. doi: 10.1016/s0091-2182(96)00154-1.
7
RU 486 in the United States and Great Britain: a case study in gender bias.
Boston College Int Comp Law Rev. 1993 Winter;16(1):81-113.
8
Antiprogestin drugs: ethical issues.
Law Med Health Care. 1992 Fall;20(3):215-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01191.x.
10
Mifepristone: A Safe Method of Medical Abortion and Self-Managed Medical Abortion in the Post-Roe Era.
Am J Ther. 2022;29(5):e534-e543. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001559. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
New psychoactive substances in Taiwan: The current situation and initiative for rational scheduling.
J Food Drug Anal. 2021 Mar 15;29(1):168-181. doi: 10.38212/2224-6614.3225.
2
Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019.
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1152-e1161. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010-14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model.
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2372-2381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31794-4. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Stigma from the Viewpoint of the Patient.
J Addict Dis. 2015;34(2-3):238-47. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2015.1059714.
5
Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days.
Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
6
To use or not to use: an update on licit and illicit ketamine use.
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2011 Mar 16;2:11-20. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S15458. eCollection 2011.
7
Drug Addiction Stigma in the Context of Methadone Maintenance Therapy: An Investigation into Understudied Sources of Stigma.
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2013 Feb 1;11(1):110-122. doi: 10.1007/s11469-012-9402-5.
8
Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):585-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301197. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
9
Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences.
Womens Health Issues. 2011 May-Jun;21(3 Suppl):S49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010.
10
Drug policy, harm and human rights: a rationalist approach.
Int J Drug Policy. 2011 May;22(3):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验