de Punder Yvonne M R, Jansen Tim L Th A, van Ede Annelies E, den Broeder Alfons A, van Riel Piet L C M, Fransen Jaap
From the Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, and the Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Y.M.R. de Punder, MD; T.L.Th. A. Jansen, MD, PhD; A.E. van Ede, MD, PhD; P.L.C.M. van Riel, MD, PhD, Professor of Rheumatology; J. Fransen, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Centre; A.A. den Broeder, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek.
J Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;42(3):398-404. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140085. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
To develop a personalized treatment target approach in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on baseline risk factors for joint damage progression in combination with disease activity over time.
Data were used from the Nijmegen early RA cohort. Presence or absence of anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and erosions were translated into 4 risk profiles: 0, 1, 2, and 3. Joint damage progression was assessed with the Ratingen score, and disease activity with the original Disease Activity Score (DAS) over 3 years. The probability for joint damage progression was calculated for each risk profile and each DAS category using logistic regression models. The probabilities were translated into personalized disease activity treatment targets.
More risk factors at baseline as well as a higher DAS level resulted in a higher probability for joint damage progression in a dose-dependent way. Low DAS corresponded with a probability of 0.0, 0.08, 0.20, and 0.58 in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively. Moderate DAS corresponded with a probability of 0.06 in patients with 0 risk factors and 0.35 with 1 risk factor. High DAS resulted in a probability of 0.50 with no risk factors present at baseline.
Presence of anti-CCP, acute-phase response, and erosions at baseline can be used to set individual treatment targets in RA. In patients without these risk factors, a moderate DAS as a target is sufficient, while for patients with all 3 risk factors, a low DAS is not strict enough to limit the risk for joint damage.
基于关节破坏进展的基线风险因素并结合随时间变化的疾病活动度,制定类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的个性化治疗目标方法。
使用奈梅亨早期RA队列的数据。抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体(抗CCP)的有无、高红细胞沉降率和骨侵蚀被转化为4种风险概况:0、1、2和3。采用雷廷根评分评估关节破坏进展情况,采用原始疾病活动度评分(DAS)评估3年期间的疾病活动度。使用逻辑回归模型计算每种风险概况和每个DAS类别下关节破坏进展的概率。将这些概率转化为个性化的疾病活动度治疗目标。
基线时风险因素越多以及DAS水平越高,关节破坏进展的概率越高,呈剂量依赖性。低DAS水平时,0、1、2和3个风险因素的患者关节破坏进展概率分别为0.0、0.08、0.20和0.58。中度DAS水平时,0个风险因素的患者关节破坏进展概率为0.06,1个风险因素的患者为0.35。基线无风险因素时,高DAS水平导致关节破坏进展概率为0.50。
基线时抗CCP的存在、急性期反应和骨侵蚀可用于设定RA的个体化治疗目标。对于没有这些风险因素的患者,将中度DAS作为目标就足够了,而对于有所有3个风险因素的患者,低DAS不足以严格限制关节破坏风险。