Park Eun-Ah, Lee Whal, Kim Hyung-Kwan, Chung Jin Wook
Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Division, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;16(1):4-12. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.1.4. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
To evaluate the influence of papillary muscles and trabeculae on left ventricular (LV) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) analysis using three methods of cavity delineation (classic or modified inclusion methods, and the exclusion method) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
This retrospective study included 20 consecutive HCM patients who underwent 1.5-T CMR imaging with short-axis cine stacks of the entire LV. LV measurements were performed using three different methods of manual cavity delineation of the endocardial and epicardial contours: method A, presumed endocardial boundary as seen on short-axis cine images; method B, including solely the cavity and closely adjacent trabeculae; or method C, excluding papillary muscles and trabeculae. Ascending aorta forward flow was measured as reference for LV-stroke volume (SV). Interobserver reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.
Method A showed larger end-diastole and end-systole volumes (largest percentage differences of 25% and 68%, respectively, p < 0.05), compared with method C. The ejection fraction was 55.7 ± 6.9% for method A, 68.6 ± 8.4% for B, and 71.7 ± 7.0% for C (p < 0.001). Mean mass was also significantly different: 164.6 ± 47.4 g for A, 176.5 ± 50.5 g for B, and 199.6 ± 53.2 g for C (p < 0.001). LV-SV error was largest with method B (p < 0.001). No difference in interobserver agreement was observed (p > 0.05).
In HCM patients, LV measurements are strikingly different dependent on whether papillary muscles and trabeculae are included or excluded. Therefore, a consistent method of LV cavity delineation may be crucial during longitudinal follow-up to avoid misinterpretation and erroneous clinical decision-making.
采用三种心腔勾勒方法(经典或改良纳入法以及排除法)评估乳头肌和小梁对肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者左心室(LV)心血管磁共振(CMR)分析的影响。
这项回顾性研究纳入了20例连续的HCM患者,这些患者接受了1.5-T CMR成像,包括整个左心室的短轴电影图像堆栈。使用三种不同的手动勾勒心内膜和心外膜轮廓的心腔方法进行左心室测量:方法A,以短轴电影图像上可见的假定心内膜边界为准;方法B,仅包括心腔和紧密相邻的小梁;或方法C,排除乳头肌和小梁。测量升主动脉前向血流作为左心室每搏输出量(SV)的参考。使用组内相关系数评估观察者间的可重复性。
与方法C相比,方法A显示舒张末期和收缩末期容积更大(最大百分比差异分别为25%和68%,p<0.05)。方法A的射血分数为55.7±6.9%,方法B为68.6±8.4%,方法C为71.7±7.0%(p<0.001)。平均质量也有显著差异:方法A为164.6±47.4g,方法B为176.5±50.5g,方法C为199.6±53.2g(p<0.001)。方法B的左心室SV误差最大(p<0.001)。观察者间一致性未观察到差异(p>0.05)。
在HCM患者中,左心室测量结果因是否包括乳头肌和小梁而有显著差异。因此,在纵向随访期间,采用一致的心腔勾勒方法对于避免错误解读和错误的临床决策可能至关重要。