Makovac Elena, Buonocore Antimo, McIntosh Robert D
a Human Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychology , University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(7):1295-305. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.979210. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
Saccades operate a continuous selection between competing targets at different locations. This competition has been mostly investigated in the visual context, and it is well known that a visual distractor can interfere with a saccade toward a visual target. Here, we investigated whether multimodal, audio-visual targets confer stronger resilience against visual distraction. Saccades to audio-visual targets had shorter latencies than saccades to unisensory stimuli. This facilitation exceeded the level that could be explained by simple probability summation, indicating that multisensory integration had occurred. The magnitude of inhibition induced by a visual distractor was comparable for saccades to unisensory and multisensory targets, but the duration of the inhibition was shorter for multimodal targets. We conclude that multisensory integration can allow a saccade plan to be reestablished more rapidly following saccadic inhibition.
扫视在不同位置的竞争目标之间进行持续选择。这种竞争大多是在视觉环境中进行研究的,众所周知,视觉干扰物会干扰朝向视觉目标的扫视。在此,我们研究了多模态视听目标是否能赋予更强的抗视觉干扰能力。与对单感官刺激的扫视相比,对视听目标的扫视潜伏期更短。这种促进作用超过了简单概率求和所能解释的水平,表明发生了多感官整合。视觉干扰物对单感官和多感官目标的扫视所诱导的抑制程度相当,但多模态目标的抑制持续时间更短。我们得出结论,多感官整合可以使扫视计划在扫视抑制后更快地重新建立。