• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逐渐沉沦:信任倾向的多样性可预测小群体中的信任下降螺旋。

Sinking slowly: Diversity in propensity to trust predicts downward trust spirals in small groups.

机构信息

Management Department.

Department of Organizational Behavior, London Business School.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1012-24. doi: 10.1037/apl0000007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000007
PMID:25602121
Abstract

This paper examines the phenomenon of trust spirals in small groups. Drawing on literature on the spiral reinforcement of trust, we theorize that diversity in propensity to trust has affective and cognitive consequences related to trust (i.e., feelings of frustration and perceptions of low similarity), reducing the level of experienced intragroup trust early in a group's development. Reduced experienced trust then fuels relationship conflict and lowers trust even further over time, ultimately having a negative effect on group performance. These ideas are tested using a sample of MBA student groups surveyed at 3 time periods over 4 months. Results confirm our hypothesis that diversity in propensity to trust is sufficient to trigger a downward trust spiral and poor performance in small groups.

摘要

本文考察了小团体中信任螺旋的现象。借鉴有关信任螺旋强化的文献,我们推断,信任倾向的多样性会对信任产生情感和认知后果(即挫败感和低相似度的感知),从而在小组发展的早期降低体验到的群体内信任水平。较低的体验信任会加剧关系冲突,并随着时间的推移进一步降低信任,最终对团队绩效产生负面影响。我们使用在 4 个月的 3 个时间点对 MBA 学生小组进行调查的样本对这些想法进行了测试。结果证实了我们的假设,即信任倾向的多样性足以引发小团体中的信任下降螺旋和绩效不佳。

相似文献

1
Sinking slowly: Diversity in propensity to trust predicts downward trust spirals in small groups.逐渐沉沦:信任倾向的多样性可预测小群体中的信任下降螺旋。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1012-24. doi: 10.1037/apl0000007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
2
Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes.信任、关系评价的可变性与关系过程。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):14-31. doi: 10.1037/a0019714.
3
Promoting cooperation and trust in "noisy" situations: the power of generosity.在“嘈杂”情境中促进合作与信任:慷慨的力量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):83-103. doi: 10.1037/a0012823.
4
Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: implications of asymmetry and dissensus.超越团队中信任和监控的共识:不对称和分歧的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):391-406. doi: 10.1037/a0026483. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
5
Members' needs, intragroup conflict, and group performance.成员需求、群体内冲突与群体绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 May;99(3):437-50. doi: 10.1037/a0036363. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Conciliatory gestures facilitate forgiveness and feelings of friendship by making transgressors appear more agreeable.和解的姿态通过使冒犯者显得更和蔼可亲,从而促进了原谅和友谊的感觉。
J Pers. 2012 Apr;80(2):503-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00728.x. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
7
Trust development: testing a new model in undergraduate roommate relationships.信任发展:在本科室友关系中测试一种新模式。
J Genet Psychol. 2014 May-Aug;175(3-4):233-51. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2013.869533. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
8
The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis.群体内冲突的悖论:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):360-90. doi: 10.1037/a0024844. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
9
Feelings of Clinician-Patient Similarity and Trust Influence Pain: Evidence From Simulated Clinical Interactions.医患相似性和信任的感受会影响疼痛:来自模拟临床互动的证据。
J Pain. 2017 Jul;18(7):787-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.02.428. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
In Small We Trust: Lay Theories About Small and Large Groups.我们信赖小群体:关于小群体和大群体的外行理论
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Oct;42(10):1321-34. doi: 10.1177/0146167216657360. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Homophily in Personality Enhances Group Success Among Real-Life Friends.性格上的相似性提升了现实生活中朋友群体的成功几率。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 4;11:710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00710. eCollection 2020.
2
A Trait-State Model of Trust Propensity: Evidence From Two Career Transitions.信任倾向的特质-状态模型:来自两次职业转型的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 5;10:2490. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02490. eCollection 2019.
3
Trust in Group Decisions: a scoping review.群体决策信任:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1726-4.
4
Conflict across representational gaps: Threats to and opportunities for improved communication.跨越代表性差距的冲突:改善沟通的威胁与机遇。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7642-7649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805866116. Epub 2019 Apr 15.