• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性格上的相似性提升了现实生活中朋友群体的成功几率。

Homophily in Personality Enhances Group Success Among Real-Life Friends.

作者信息

Laakasuo Michael, Rotkirch Anna, van Duijn Max, Berg Venla, Jokela Markus, David-Barrett Tamas, Miettinen Anneli, Pearce Eiluned, Dunbar Robin

机构信息

Department of Digital Humanities, Cognitive Science Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Population Research Institute, Väestöliitto, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 May 4;11:710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00710. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00710
PMID:32431638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7212830/
Abstract

Personality affects dyadic relations and teamwork, yet its role among groups of friends has been little explored. We examine for the first time whether similarity in personality enhances the effectiveness of real-life friendship groups. Using data from a longitudinal study of a European fraternity (10 male and 15 female groups), we investigate how individual Big Five personality traits were associated with group formation and whether personality homophily related to how successful the groups were over 1 year ( = 147-196). Group success was measured as group performance/identification (adoption of group markers) and as group bonding (using the inclusion-of-other-in-self scale). Results show that individuals' similarity in neuroticism and conscientiousness predicted group formation. Furthermore, personality similarity was associated with group success, even after controlling for individual's own personality. Especially higher group-level similarity in conscientiousness was associated with group performance, and with bonding in male groups.

摘要

人格会影响二元关系和团队合作,但其在朋友圈子中的作用却鲜有研究。我们首次考察人格相似性是否能提高现实生活中朋友圈子的效能。利用一项针对欧洲兄弟会的纵向研究数据(10个男性团体和15个女性团体),我们调查了个体的大五人格特质如何与团体形成相关联,以及人格同质性是否与团体在1年时间里的成功程度有关(= 147 - 196)。团体成功的衡量指标包括团体表现/认同(采用团体标志)以及团体凝聚力(使用自我包含他人量表)。结果表明,个体在神经质和尽责性方面的相似性预测了团体的形成。此外,即使在控制了个体自身的人格之后,人格相似性仍与团体成功相关。尤其是团体层面更高的尽责性相似性与团体表现以及男性团体的凝聚力相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/ae6e73372fc8/fpsyg-11-00710-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/af96347d7460/fpsyg-11-00710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/8c7aadaa000f/fpsyg-11-00710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/026824ab93c4/fpsyg-11-00710-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/ae6e73372fc8/fpsyg-11-00710-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/af96347d7460/fpsyg-11-00710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/8c7aadaa000f/fpsyg-11-00710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/026824ab93c4/fpsyg-11-00710-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801e/7212830/ae6e73372fc8/fpsyg-11-00710-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Homophily in Personality Enhances Group Success Among Real-Life Friends.性格上的相似性提升了现实生活中朋友群体的成功几率。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 4;11:710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00710. eCollection 2020.
2
In the eye of the beholder: perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process.在旁观者眼中:相识过程中在个性、沟通和友谊亲密度方面的感知、实际及同伴评价的相似性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;96(6):1152-65. doi: 10.1037/a0014468.
3
Similarity in functional brain connectivity at rest predicts interpersonal closeness in the social network of an entire village.静息状态下功能脑连接的相似性可预测整个村庄社交网络中的人际亲密度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 29;117(52):33149-33160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013606117. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
4
Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity.人格的特质性与社会共识性方法:自我视角、他人感知视角和同伴视角的相似性
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jul;109(1):121-41. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000035. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
Establishing the associations between the Big Five personality traits and self-reported number of close friends: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study.大五人格特质与自我报告的亲密朋友数量之间的关联研究:一项横断和纵向研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Sep;239:104010. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104010. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
6
Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: a social network approach.新兴的青少年后期友谊网络与大五人格特质:社会网络方法。
J Pers. 2010 Apr;78(2):509-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x.
7
Big Five personality stability, change, and codevelopment across adolescence and early adulthood.大五人格特质在青少年期和成年早期的稳定性、可变性和共同发展。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Oct;113(4):641-657. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000138. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
Individual and structural origins of friendship and social position among professionals.专业人士之间友谊和社会地位的个体及结构根源。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):340-51.
9
Personality and emerging adults' friend selection on social networking sites: A social network analysis perspective.个性与新兴成年人在社交网站上的朋友选择:一种社会网络分析视角
Psych J. 2021 Feb;10(1):62-75. doi: 10.1002/pchj.404. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
10
Personality traits and types predict medical school stress: a six-year longitudinal and nationwide study.人格特质与类型可预测医学院校压力:一项为期六年的全国性纵向研究。
Med Educ. 2007 Aug;41(8):781-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02802.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural similarity and interaction success in autistic and non-autistic adolescents.自闭症和非自闭症青少年的神经相似性与互动成功情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 7;15(1):7996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91176-9.
2
Self-views converge during enjoyable conversations.在愉快的对话中,自我观点会趋于一致。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 22;121(43):e2321652121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321652121. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
3
Personality heterophily and friendship as drivers for successful cooperation.人格异质性和友谊是成功合作的驱动力。

本文引用的文献

1
Herding Friends in Similarity-Based Architecture of Social Networks.社交网络基于相似性的架构中的羊群朋友。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 17;10(1):4859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61330-6.
2
Network Effects of Demographic Transition.人口转变的网络效应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):2361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39025-4.
3
Social dilemma cooperation (unlike Dictator Game giving) is intuitive for men as well as women.社会困境合作(与独裁者博弈给予不同)对男性和女性来说都是直观的。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 27;291(2019):20232730. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2730.
4
Do birds of a feather leave the nest together? The role of sibling personality similarity in the transition to adulthood.物以类聚,人以群分?同胞个性相似性在成年过渡中的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 May 17;18(5):e0284808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284808. eCollection 2023.
5
Structure and function in human and primate social networks: implications for diffusion, network stability and health.人类和灵长类动物社交网络的结构与功能:对传播、网络稳定性及健康的影响
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Aug;476(2240):20200446. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0446. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 Nov;73:164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
4
Why are there so many explanations for primate brain evolution?为什么对于灵长类动物大脑的进化有如此多的解释?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 19;372(1727). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0244.
5
Fertility, kinship and the evolution of mass ideologies.生育能力、亲属关系与大众意识形态的演变。
J Theor Biol. 2017 Mar 21;417:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
6
Singing together or apart: The effect of competitive and cooperative singing on social bonding within and between sub-groups of a university Fraternity.一起唱歌或分开唱歌:竞争性和合作性唱歌对大学兄弟会亚群体内部和之间社会联系的影响。
Psychol Music. 2016 Nov;44(6):1255-1273. doi: 10.1177/0305735616636208. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men.社会启发法与社会角色:直觉促使女性利他,但对男性却并非如此。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Apr;145(4):389-96. doi: 10.1037/xge0000154. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
8
Playing with Strangers: Which Shared Traits Attract Us Most to New People?与陌生人交往:哪些共同特质最吸引我们接近新人?
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 8;10(6):e0129688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129688. eCollection 2015.
9
Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking.女性青睐二元关系,而男性更喜欢俱乐部:来自社交网络的跨文化证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0118329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118329. eCollection 2015.
10
Sinking slowly: Diversity in propensity to trust predicts downward trust spirals in small groups.逐渐沉沦:信任倾向的多样性可预测小群体中的信任下降螺旋。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1012-24. doi: 10.1037/apl0000007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.