• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用于急性心力衰竭RICA注册研究的SENIORS老年心力衰竭风险模型的效用

Utility of the SENIORS elderly heart failure risk model applied to the RICA registry of acute heart failure.

作者信息

Montero-Perez-Barquero Manuel, Manzano Luis, Formiga Francesc, Roughton Michael, Coats Andrew, Rodríguez-Artalejo Fernando, Diez-Manglano Jesus, Bettencourt Paulo, Llacer Pau, Flather Marcus

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, IMIBIC/Hospital Reina Sofia, University of Córdoba, Spain.

Heart Failure and Vascular Risk Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 1;182:449-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.173. Epub 2015 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.173
PMID:25602297
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is predominantly a disease of the elderly. Reliable risk stratification would help in the management of this population, but no model has been well evaluated in elderly HF patients in both acute and chronic settings and not being restricted by ejection fraction. To evaluate the utility of the SENIORS risk model, developed from a clinical trial of elderly patients with chronic HF, in an independent cohort (National Spanish Registry: RICA) of elderly acute HF patients.

METHODS

We applied the SENIORS risk model to 926 patients in RICA to estimate risk at one year of a) composite outcome of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospital admission and b) all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

In the RICA registry mean age was 78years, mean ejection fraction 51% and 87% were in NYHA II and III. At one year death/CV hospitalization occurred in 31.9% and all-cause mortality in 19.5%. The risk model provided good separation of Kaplan Meier curves stratified by tertile for death/CV hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The observed versus expected rates of death/CV hospitalization in the lowest, middle and highest risk tertiles were (%) 34/24, 45/41 and 57/67, and for death 13/16, 32/38 and 44/70 respectively. C-statistic for all-cause mortality or CV hospitalization was 0.60 and for all-cause mortality 0.66.

CONCLUSION

The SENIORS risk model was a reliable tool for relative risk stratification among acute heart failure patients in a "real world" registry, but predicted versus observed risk showed some variability. The model provides a useful basis for clinical risk prediction.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭(HF)主要是一种老年疾病。可靠的风险分层有助于对这一人群进行管理,但尚无模型在老年HF患者的急性和慢性情况下均得到充分评估,且不受射血分数的限制。为了评估从老年慢性HF患者临床试验中开发的SENIORS风险模型在老年急性HF患者的独立队列(西班牙国家注册:RICA)中的效用。

方法

我们将SENIORS风险模型应用于RICA中的926例患者,以估计一年时以下情况的风险:a)全因死亡或心血管住院的复合结局;b)全因死亡。

结果

在RICA注册中心,平均年龄为78岁,平均射血分数为51%,87%的患者为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)II级和III级。一年时,死亡/心血管住院发生率为31.9%,全因死亡率为19.5%。风险模型对按三分位数分层的Kaplan Meier曲线进行了良好的区分,用于死亡/心血管住院和全因死亡率。在最低、中等和最高风险三分位数中,观察到的与预期的死亡/心血管住院率分别为(%)34/24、45/41和57/67,死亡的观察与预期率分别为13/16、32/38和44/70。全因死亡率或心血管住院的C统计量为0.60,全因死亡率的C统计量为0.66。

结论

SENIORS风险模型是在“真实世界”注册中心对急性心力衰竭患者进行相对风险分层的可靠工具,但预测风险与观察到的风险存在一定差异。该模型为临床风险预测提供了有用的基础。

相似文献

1
Utility of the SENIORS elderly heart failure risk model applied to the RICA registry of acute heart failure.应用于急性心力衰竭RICA注册研究的SENIORS老年心力衰竭风险模型的效用
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 1;182:449-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.173. Epub 2015 Jan 4.
2
Combining heart rate and systolic blood pressure to improve risk stratification in older patients with heart failure: Findings from the RICA Registry.结合心率和收缩压以改善老年心力衰竭患者的风险分层:RICA注册研究结果
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:625-629. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.041. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
Risk stratification of mortality in patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction >35%.射血分数>35%的心力衰竭患者死亡率的风险分层。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 1;103(7):1003-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.061.
4
Relationship between osteoprotegerin and mortality in decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的失代偿性心力衰竭中骨保护素与死亡率的关系。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Jun;16(6):438-43. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000229.
5
Clinical factors related to morbidity and mortality in high-risk heart failure patients: the GUIDE-IT predictive model and risk score.与高危心力衰竭患者发病率和死亡率相关的临床因素:GUIDE-IT 预测模型和风险评分。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;21(6):770-778. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1450. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Incremental Value of Gait Speed in Predicting Prognosis of Older Adults With Heart Failure: Insights From the IMAGE-HF Study.步速增加对老年心力衰竭患者预后预测的价值:来自 IMAGE-HF 研究的见解。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Apr;4(4):289-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
7
Optimized management of heart failure patients aged 80 years or more improves outcomes versus usual care: The HF80 randomized trial.与常规治疗相比,优化80岁及以上心力衰竭患者的管理可改善预后:HF80随机试验。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Dec;109(12):667-678. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
The utility of heart failure registries: a descriptive and comparative study of two heart failure registries.心力衰竭登记处的效用:两个心力衰竭登记处的描述性和比较性研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2016 May;92(1087):260-6. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133739. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
9
Basal functional status predicts three-month mortality after a heart failure hospitalization in elderly patients - the prospective RICA study.基础功能状态预测老年心力衰竭住院患者三个月后的死亡率 - 前瞻性 RICA 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Mar 1;172(1):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.169. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
10
New onset heart failure--Clinical characteristics and short-term mortality. A RICA (Spanish registry of acute heart failure) study.新发心力衰竭——临床特征和短期死亡率。一项 RICA(西班牙急性心力衰竭注册研究)研究。
Eur J Intern Med. 2015 Jun;26(5):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Larissa Heart Failure Risk Score: Predictive Value in 9207 Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure from a Single Center.拉里萨心力衰竭风险评分分析:对单中心9207例因心力衰竭住院患者的预测价值
J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 17;13(12):1721. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121721.
2
Evaluating risk prediction models for adults with heart failure: A systematic literature review.评估成人心力衰竭风险预测模型:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0224135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224135. eCollection 2020.
3
Utilisation of real-world data from heart failure registries in OECD countries - A systematic review.
经合组织国家心力衰竭登记处真实世界数据的利用——一项系统评价。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2018 Mar 9;19:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.02.006. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Real-world heart failure management in 10,910 patients with chronic heart failure in the Netherlands : Design and rationale of the Chronic Heart failure ESC guideline-based Cardiology practice Quality project (CHECK-HF) registry.荷兰10910例慢性心力衰竭患者的真实世界心力衰竭管理:基于欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)慢性心力衰竭指南的心脏病学实践质量项目(CHECK-HF)注册研究的设计与原理
Neth Heart J. 2018 May;26(5):272-279. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1103-7.
5
Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.射血分数保留的心力衰竭的当前管理与未来方向:一项当代综述
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Mar 20;20(4):28. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0623-1.