Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 31;609:1286-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.271. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
Dairy farms have been widely acknowledged as a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The need for a more environmentally friendly milk production system will likely be important going forward. Whereas methane (CH) enteric emissions can only be reduced to a limited extent, CH manure emissions can be reduced by implementing mitigation strategies, such as the use of an anaerobic digestion (AD). Furthermore, implementing a photovoltaic (PV) electricity generation system could mitigate the fossil fuels used to cover the electrical needs of farms. In the present study to detect the main environmental hotspots of milk production, a Life Cycle Assessment was adopted to build the Life Cycle Inventory according to ISO 14040 and 14044 in a conventional dairy farm (1368 animals) provided by AD and PV systems. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change tiered approach was adopted to associate the level of emission with each item in the life cycle inventory. The functional unit refers to 1kg of fat-and-protein-corrected-milk (FPCM). In addition to milk products, other important co-products need to be considered: meat and renewable energy production from AD and PV systems. A physical allocation was applied to attribute GHG emissions among milk and meat products. Renewable energy production from AD and PV systems was considered, discounting carbon credits due to lower CH manure emissions and to the minor exploitation of fossil energy. The CF of this farm scenario was 1.11kg COeq/kg FPCM. The inclusion of AD allowed for the reduction of GHG emissions from milk production by 0.26kg COeq/kg FPCM. The PV system contribution was negligible due to the small dimensions of the technology. The results obtained in this study confirm that integrating milk production with other co-products, originated from more efficient manure management, is a successful strategy to mitigate the environmental impact of dairy production.
奶牛场已被广泛认为是温室气体(GHG)排放的来源。未来,需要建立一个更环保的牛奶生产体系。虽然甲烷(CH)肠道排放只能在一定程度上减少,但通过实施缓解策略,如利用厌氧消化(AD),可以减少 CH 粪便排放。此外,实施光伏(PV)发电系统可以减轻用于满足农场电力需求的化石燃料的使用。在本研究中,为了检测牛奶生产的主要环境热点,采用生命周期评估方法,根据 ISO 14040 和 14044 为常规奶牛场(1368 头动物)建立生命周期清单,并提供 AD 和 PV 系统。政府间气候变化专门委员会的分层方法用于将排放水平与生命周期清单中的每个项目相关联。功能单位是指 1kg 脂肪和蛋白质校正奶(FPCM)。除了奶制品,还需要考虑其他重要的联产:来自 AD 和 PV 系统的肉类和可再生能源生产。物理分配用于在牛奶和肉类产品之间分配 GHG 排放。考虑到 AD 和 PV 系统的可再生能源生产,由于 CH 粪便排放减少和化石能源开发较少,扣除了碳信用额。该农场方案的 CF 为 1.11kg COeq/kg FPCM。AD 的纳入使牛奶生产的 GHG 排放量减少了 0.26kg COeq/kg FPCM。由于技术规模较小,PV 系统的贡献可以忽略不计。本研究的结果证实,将牛奶生产与其他源自更高效粪便管理的联产结合起来,是减轻奶牛生产环境影响的成功策略。