Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚和新西兰的遗传咨询师对基层医疗服务层面的私人执业感兴趣吗?

Are Australasian Genetic Counselors Interested in Private Practice at the Primary Care Level of Health Service?

作者信息

Sane Vrunda, Humphreys Linda, Peterson Madelyn

机构信息

School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Brisbane, QLD, 4069, Australia.

School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2015 Oct;24(5):783-96. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9809-1. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

Abstract

This study explored the perceived interest in development of private genetic counseling services in collaboration with primary care physicians in the Australasian setting by online survey of members of the Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors. Four hypothetical private practice models of professional collaboration between genetic counselors and primary care physicians or clinical geneticists were proposed to gauge interest and enthusiasm of ASGC members for this type of professional development. Perceived barriers and facilitators were also evaluated. 78 completed responses were included for analysis. The majority of participants (84.6 %) showed a positive degree of interest and enthusiasm towards potential for clinical work in private practice. All proposed practice models yielded a positive degree of interest from participants. Model 4 (the only model of collaboration with a clinical geneticist rather than primary care physician) was the clearly preferred option (mean = 4.26/5), followed by Model 2 (collaboration with a single primary care practice) (mean = 4.09/5), Model 3 (collaboration with multiple primary care clinics, multidisciplinary clinic or specialty clinic) (mean = 3.77/5) and finally, Model 1 (mean = 3.61/5), which was the most independent model of practice. When participants ranked the options in the order of preference, Model 4 remained the most popular first preference (44.6 %), followed by model 2 (21.6 %), model 3 (18.9 %) and model 1 was again least popular (10.8 %). There was no significant statistical correlation between demographic characteristics (age bracket, years of work experience, current level of work autonomy) and participants' preference for private practice models. Support from clinical genetics colleagues and the professional society was highly rated as a facilitator and, conversely, lack of such support as a significant barrier.

摘要

本研究通过对澳大利亚遗传咨询师协会成员进行在线调查,探讨了在澳大拉西亚地区与初级保健医生合作开展私人遗传咨询服务的潜在兴趣。提出了四种遗传咨询师与初级保健医生或临床遗传学家之间专业合作的假设私人执业模式,以评估澳大利亚遗传咨询师协会成员对这类专业发展的兴趣和热情。同时还评估了感知到的障碍和促进因素。纳入78份完整回复进行分析。大多数参与者(84.6%)对私人执业临床工作的潜力表现出积极程度的兴趣和热情。所有提出的执业模式都获得了参与者的积极兴趣。模式4(唯一与临床遗传学家而非初级保健医生合作的模式)显然是首选选项(平均分为4.26/5),其次是模式2(与单一初级保健机构合作)(平均分为4.09/5),模式3(与多个初级保健诊所、多学科诊所或专科诊所合作)(平均分为3.77/5),最后是模式1(平均分为3.61/5),它是最独立的执业模式。当参与者按偏好顺序对选项进行排序时,模式4仍然是最受欢迎的首选(44.6%),其次是模式2(21.6%),模式3(18.9%),模式1再次最不受欢迎(10.8%)。人口统计学特征(年龄组、工作年限、当前工作自主权水平)与参与者对私人执业模式的偏好之间没有显著的统计相关性。临床遗传学同事和专业协会的支持被高度评价为促进因素,相反,缺乏这种支持则被视为重大障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验