Sweet Kevin, Sturm Amy C, Schmidlen Tara, McElroy Joseph, Scheinfeldt Laura, Manickam Kandamurugu, Gordon Erynn S, Hovick Shelly, Scott Roberts J, Toland Amanda Ewart, Christman Michael
Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43420, USA.
Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University, 2001 Polaris Parkway, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):980-998. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0073-z. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
There has been very limited study of patients with chronic disease receiving potentially actionable genomic based results or the utilization of genetic counselors in the online result delivery process. We conducted a randomized controlled trial on 199 patients with chronic disease each receiving eight personalized and actionable complex disease reports online. Primary study aims were to assess the impact of in-person genomic counseling on 1) causal attribution of disease risk, 2) personal awareness of disease risk, and 3) perceived risk of developing a particular disease. Of 98 intervention arm participants (mean age = 57.8; 39% female) randomized for in-person genomic counseling, 76 (78%) were seen. In contrast, control arm participants (n = 101; mean age = 58.5; 54% female) were initially not offered genomic counseling as part of the study protocol but were able to access in-person genomic counseling, if they requested it, 3-months post viewing of at least one test report and post-completion of the study-specific follow-up survey. A total of 64 intervention arm and 59 control arm participants completed follow-up survey measures. We found that participants receiving in-person genomic counseling had enhanced objective understanding of the genetic variant risk contribution for multiple complex diseases. Genomic counseling was associated with lowered participant causal beliefs in genetic influence across all eight diseases, compared to control participants. Our findings also illustrate that for the majority of diseases under study, intervention arm participants believed they knew their genetic risk status better than control arm subjects. Disease risk was modified for the majority during genomic counseling, due to the assessment of more comprehensive family history. In conclusion, for patients receiving personalized and actionable genomic results through a web portal, genomic counseling enhanced their objective understanding of the genetic variant risk contribution to multiple common diseases. These results support the development of additional genomic counseling interventions to ensure a high level of patient comprehension and improve patient-centered health outcomes.
对于接受基于基因组学且可能具有可操作性结果的慢性病患者,以及在在线结果传递过程中遗传咨询师的利用情况,相关研究非常有限。我们对199名慢性病患者进行了一项随机对照试验,每位患者在线接收八份个性化且具有可操作性的复杂疾病报告。主要研究目的是评估面对面基因组咨询对以下方面的影响:1)疾病风险的因果归因;2)个人对疾病风险的认知;3)患特定疾病的感知风险。在98名被随机分配接受面对面基因组咨询的干预组参与者中(平均年龄 = 57.8岁;39%为女性),有76人(78%)接受了咨询。相比之下,对照组参与者(n = 101;平均年龄 = 58.5岁;54%为女性)最初未按照研究方案接受基因组咨询,但在查看至少一份检测报告并完成特定研究的随访调查3个月后,若他们提出请求,能够获得面对面基因组咨询。共有64名干预组和59名对照组参与者完成了随访调查测量。我们发现,接受面对面基因组咨询的参与者对多种复杂疾病的基因变异风险贡献有了更客观的理解。与对照组参与者相比,基因组咨询与所有八种疾病中参与者对遗传影响的因果信念降低有关。我们的研究结果还表明,对于大多数所研究的疾病,干预组参与者认为他们比对照组受试者更了解自己的遗传风险状况。由于对更全面家族史的评估,在基因组咨询期间大多数患者的疾病风险得到了修正。总之,对于通过门户网站接收个性化且具有可操作性基因组结果的患者,基因组咨询增强了他们对基因变异对多种常见疾病风险贡献的客观理解。这些结果支持开发更多的基因组咨询干预措施,以确保患者有较高的理解水平,并改善以患者为中心的健康结果。