Karam Marilyn, Samuels Kiela, Holland Christine, Hernandez Cynthia, Greenhawt Matthew
Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich; University of Michigan School of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Mich.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Mar-Apr;3(2):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Little is known about the adherence rate to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) labeling guidelines.
To assess adherence to labeling guidelines of AIT Practice Parameter 2011 at University of Michigan Health Service.
AIT vials of 320 patients who received their care at the University of Michigan Health Service were reviewed. Data collected looked at patient identifiers (PI), concentrations in volume/volume (v/v) format, color coding, allergen content, expiration date and instructions about AIT dosing, and systemic reaction treatment. Data were analyzed by using χ(2) test and the Fisher exact test and logistic regression.
Of 238 non-university formulated labels, 65% had 2 PIs, 62% had a v/v concentration, 41% had color coding, 71% had the content listed, and 100% had a recorded expiration date. Only 21% had all 5 recommended components. All 82 University vials had 5 components. Labels with 2 PIs were more likely to have a v/v concentration with its corresponding color coding (odds ratio [OR] 3.84 [95% CI, 1.9-7.7]; P < .001). Labels that specified the extract's content were more likely to be color coded or to have a v/v concentration listed (OR 6.3 [95% CI, 3.4-11.8]; P < .001). For all AIT vials, complete labels were significantly more likely to have a clear buildup schedule (OR 9.6 [95% CI, 4.2-23.2]; P < .001), dosing adjustment after a missed dose (OR 8.2 [95% CI, 3.4-19.8]; P < .001) or after a reaction (OR 13.7 [95% CI, 7.8-2.1]; P < .001), and clear systemic reaction treatment instructions (OR 9.7 [95% CI, 7.8-24.1]; P < .001).
Fewer than 25% of the nonuniversity prescribers adhered to AIT practice parameters 5 years after publication. Recording 2 PIs, the v/v concentration, or the color coding increased the likelihood of having a complete label. Complete label contents were associated with clear instructions about AIT dosing and reaction treatment and/or dose adjustments.
关于变应原免疫疗法(AIT)标签指南的依从率知之甚少。
评估密歇根大学健康服务中心对2011年AIT实践参数标签指南的依从情况。
对在密歇根大学健康服务中心接受治疗的320例患者的AIT药瓶进行审查。收集的数据包括患者标识符(PI)、体积/体积(v/v)格式的浓度、颜色编码、变应原含量、有效期以及关于AIT给药和全身反应治疗的说明。采用χ²检验、Fisher精确检验和逻辑回归分析数据。
在238个非大学配制的标签中,65%有2个PI,62%有v/v浓度,41%有颜色编码,71%列出了含量,100%记录了有效期。只有21%具备所有5项推荐内容。所有82个大学药瓶都有5项内容。有2个PI的标签更有可能有与其相应颜色编码的v/v浓度(优势比[OR]3.84[95%CI,1.9 - 7.7];P <.001)。明确提取物含量的标签更有可能有颜色编码或列出v/v浓度(OR 6.3[95%CI,3.4 - 11.8];P <.001)。对于所有AIT药瓶,完整的标签更有可能有明确的递增时间表(OR 9.6[95%CI,4.2 - 23.2];P <.001)、漏服剂量后的剂量调整(OR 8.2[95%CI,3.4 - 19.8];P <.001)或反应后的剂量调整(OR 13.7[95%CI,7.8 - 2.1];P <.001)以及明确的全身反应治疗说明(OR 9.7[95%CI,7.8 - 24.1];P <.001)。
在指南发布5年后,不到25%的非大学处方者遵守AIT实践参数。记录2个PI、v/v浓度或颜色编码增加了拥有完整标签的可能性。完整的标签内容与关于AIT给药、反应治疗和/或剂量调整的明确说明相关。