New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, USA.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01489.x. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
To estimate the relative contribution of patient attributes, provider characteristics and organizational features of the doctors' workplace to the diagnosis and management of diabetes.
In a factorial experimental design doctors (n = 192) viewed clinically authentic vignettes of 'patients' presenting with identical signs and symptoms. Doctor subjects were primary care doctors stratified according to gender and level of experience. During an in-person interview scheduled between real patients, doctors were asked how they would diagnosis and manage the vignette 'patients' in clinical practice.
This study considered the relative contribution of patient, doctor and organizational factors. Taken together patient attributes explained only 4.4% of the variability in diabetes diagnosis. Doctor factors explained only 2.0%. The vast majority of the explained variance in diabetes diagnosis was due to organizational factors (14.3%). Relative contributions combined (patient, provider, organizational factors) explained only 20% of the total variance.
Attempts to reduce health care variations usually focus on the education/activation of patients, or increased training of doctors. Our findings suggest that shifting quality improvement efforts to the area which contributes most to the creation and amplification of variations (organizational influences) may produce better results in terms of reduced variations in health care associated with diabetes.
评估患者特征、医生特征和医生工作场所的组织特征对糖尿病诊断和治疗的相对贡献。
在一项基于实际情况的实验设计中,医生(n=192)观看了具有相同体征和症状的“患者”呈现的临床真实病例。根据性别和经验水平对医生进行分层,这些医生是初级保健医生。在预约的真实患者就诊期间,医生被要求在临床实践中如何诊断和治疗病例“患者”。
本研究考虑了患者、医生和组织因素的相对贡献。综合来看,患者特征仅解释了糖尿病诊断变异性的 4.4%。医生因素仅解释了 2.0%。糖尿病诊断中大部分可解释的变异性归因于组织因素(14.3%)。综合相对贡献(患者、提供者、组织因素)仅解释了总方差的 20%。
减少医疗保健差异的尝试通常集中在对患者的教育/激活,或增加医生的培训上。我们的研究结果表明,将质量改进工作转移到对差异的产生和放大贡献最大的领域(组织影响)可能会在减少与糖尿病相关的医疗保健差异方面产生更好的结果。