Cattamanchi Adithya, Miller Cecily R, Tapley Asa, Haguma Priscilla, Ochom Emmanuel, Ackerman Sara, Davis J Lucian, Katamba Achilles, Handley Margaret A
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, Room 5K1, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94110, USA.
Curry International Tuberculosis Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0668-0.
Studies of the quality of tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic evaluation of patients in high burden countries have generally shown poor adherence to international or national guidelines. Health worker perspectives on barriers to improving TB diagnostic evaluation are critical for developing clinic-level interventions to improve guideline implementation.
We conducted structured, in-depth interviews with staff at six district-level health centers in Uganda to elicit their perceptions regarding barriers to TB evaluation. Interviews were transcribed, coded with a standardized framework, and analyzed to identify emergent themes. We used thematic analysis to develop a logic model depicting health system and contextual barriers to recommended TB evaluation practices. To identify possible clinic-level interventions to improve TB evaluation, we categorized findings into predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors as described by the PRECEDE model, focusing on potentially modifiable behaviors at the clinic-level.
We interviewed 22 health center staff between February 2010 and November 2011. Participants identified key health system barriers hindering TB evaluation, including: stock-outs of drugs/supplies, inadequate space and infrastructure, lack of training, high workload, low staff motivation, and poor coordination of health center services. Contextual barrier challenges to TB evaluation were also reported, including the time and costs borne by patients to seek and complete TB evaluation, poor health literacy, and stigma against patients with TB. These contextual barriers interacted with health system barriers to contribute to sub-standard TB evaluation. Examples of intervention strategies that could address these barriers and are related to PRECEDE model components include: assigned mentors/peer coaching for new staff (targets predisposing factor of low motivation and need for support to conduct job duties); facilitated workshops to implement same day microscopy (targets enabling factor of patient barriers to completing TB evaluation), and recognition/incentives for good TB screening practices (targets low motivation and self-efficacy).
Our findings suggest that health system and contextual barriers work together to impede TB diagnosis at health centers and, if not addressed, could hinder TB case detection efforts. Qualitative research that improves understanding of the barriers facing TB providers is critical to developing targeted interventions to improve TB care.
对高负担国家结核病(TB)患者诊断评估质量的研究普遍表明,对国际或国家指南的遵循情况较差。卫生工作者对改善结核病诊断评估障碍的看法对于制定临床层面的干预措施以改善指南实施至关重要。
我们对乌干达六个区级卫生中心的工作人员进行了结构化的深入访谈,以了解他们对结核病评估障碍的看法。访谈内容被转录,用标准化框架进行编码,并进行分析以确定新出现的主题。我们使用主题分析来构建一个逻辑模型,描述卫生系统和背景因素对推荐的结核病评估实践的障碍。为了确定可能改善结核病评估的临床层面干预措施,我们将研究结果按照PRECEDE模型所描述的易患因素、促成因素和强化因素进行分类,重点关注临床层面潜在可改变的行为。
在2010年2月至2011年11月期间,我们采访了22名卫生中心工作人员。参与者确定了阻碍结核病评估的关键卫生系统障碍,包括:药品/物资短缺、空间和基础设施不足、缺乏培训、工作量大、工作人员积极性低以及卫生中心服务协调不善。还报告了结核病评估面临的背景障碍挑战,包括患者寻求和完成结核病评估所花费的时间和成本、健康素养低以及对结核病患者的污名化。这些背景障碍与卫生系统障碍相互作用,导致结核病评估不达标。与PRECEDE模型组成部分相关的、可以解决这些障碍的干预策略示例包括:为新员工指定导师/同伴辅导(针对积极性低和履行工作职责需要支持的易患因素);举办促进当日显微镜检查的研讨会(针对患者完成结核病评估障碍的促成因素),以及对良好结核病筛查实践的认可/激励(针对积极性低和自我效能感低的情况)。
我们的研究结果表明,卫生系统和背景障碍共同阻碍了卫生中心的结核病诊断,如果不加以解决,可能会阻碍结核病病例发现工作。提高对结核病提供者所面临障碍的理解的定性研究对于制定有针对性的干预措施以改善结核病护理至关重要。