Roth Klaus Edgar, Mueller Ramona, Schwand Eike, Maier Gerrit Stefen, Schmidtmann Irene, Sariyar Murat, Maus Uwe
Center of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, 55131 Germany.
Department for Neurosurgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, 55131 Germany.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 Dec 19;7(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3. eCollection 2014.
It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund's deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over-resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resulting question with regard to the quantitative differences of the extent of the bone removed using these two techniques has not yet been answered. The purpose of the study was to determine the resection volume of calcaneal bone for open and endoscopic surgical techniques.
16 feet obtained from body donors were operated on in equal parts using either open surgical or endoscopic techniques, with the technique selected on a random basis. High-resolution CT scans were obtained before and after the interventional procedure and analysed to obtain 3-D polygon models. Post-operative models were subtracted from pre-operative models to provide the volume change resulting from the intervention. This was then correlated with the bone mineral density (BMD) of the preparation.
The extent of bony resection was greater in open surgical techniques than in endoscopic approaches. The average volume of bone resection was 0.80 (±0.34) cm(3) in the endoscopic group and 3.04 (±2.91) cm(3) in the group that underwent open surgery. After adjustment for bone mineral density the extent of the resection was significantly larger (p = 0.018) in the group undergoing open surgery. The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to BMD (p > 0.1). The extent of the resection fell by 0.011 cm(3) per 1 mg/cm(3) areal bone mineral density, i.e., a slightly lower degree of bone resection was associated with a higher bone mineral density.
Assuming that the resection volume was adequate to treat the patient's complaints a smaller resection volume seen in our study using an endoscopic technique might lead to fewer postoperative complaints and faster recovery.
据称,在内镜下跟骨成形术治疗Haglund畸形的手术中,相较于开放手术技术,因其术后并发症如僵硬和疼痛较少而具有一些优势。骨质过度切除会使患者面临这些并发症的风险。关于使用这两种技术切除骨量的定量差异这一问题尚未得到解答。本研究的目的是确定开放手术和内镜手术技术下跟骨的切除体积。
从尸体供体获取的16只足,随机分为两组,分别采用开放手术或内镜技术进行等量手术操作。在介入操作前后进行高分辨率CT扫描,并进行分析以获得三维多边形模型。用术前模型减去术后模型以得出干预导致的体积变化。然后将其与所制备样本的骨矿物质密度(BMD)相关联。
开放手术技术的骨质切除范围大于内镜手术入路。内镜组的平均骨切除体积为0.80(±0.34)cm³,开放手术组为3.04(±2.91)cm³。在校正骨矿物质密度后,开放手术组的切除范围显著更大(p = 0.018)。两组在骨矿物质密度方面无显著差异(p > 0.1)。每1mg/cm²面积骨矿物质密度,切除范围减少0.011cm³,即骨矿物质密度较高与骨切除程度略低相关。
假设切除体积足以治疗患者的症状,在我们的研究中使用内镜技术所见的较小切除体积可能导致术后并发症更少且恢复更快。