Harrison T Kyle, Kim T Edward, Howard Steven K, Funck Natasha, Wagner Michael J, Walters Tessa L, Curtin Catherine, Chang James, Ganaway Toni, Mariano Edward R
Departments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine (T.K.H., T.E.K., S.K.H., N.F., M.J.W., T.L.W., T.G., E.R.M.) and Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (C.C., J.C.), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California USA; and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Feb;34(2):333-40. doi: 10.7863/ultra.34.2.333.
Using a through-the-needle local anesthetic bolus technique, ultrasound-guided infraclavicular perineural catheters have been shown to provide greater analgesia compared to supraclavicular catheters. A through-the-catheter bolus technique, which arguably "tests" the anesthetic efficacy of the catheter before initiating an infusion, has been validated for infraclavicular catheters but not supraclavicular catheters. This study investigated the through-the-catheter bolus technique for supraclavicular catheters and tested the hypothesis that infraclavicular catheters provide faster onset of brachial plexus anesthesia.
Preoperatively, patients were randomly assigned to receive either a supraclavicular or an infraclavicular catheter using an ultrasound-guided nonstimulating catheter insertion technique with a mepivacaine bolus via the catheter and ropivacaine perineural infusion initiated postoperatively. The primary outcome was time to achieve complete sensory anesthesia in the ulnar and median nerve distributions. Secondary outcomes included procedural time, procedure-related pain and complications, and postoperative pain, opioid consumption, sleep disturbances, and motor weakness.
Fifty patients were enrolled in the study; all but 2 perineural catheters were successfully placed per protocol. Twenty-one of 24 (88%) and 24 of 24 (100%) patients in the supraclavicular and infraclavicular groups, respectively, achieved complete sensory anesthesia by 30 minutes (P= .088). There was no difference in the time to achieve complete sensory anesthesia. Supraclavicular patients reported more sleep disturbances postoperatively, but there were no statistically significant differences in other outcomes.
Both supraclavicular and infraclavicular perineural catheters using a through-the-catheter bolus technique provide effective brachial plexus anesthesia.
采用经针单次注射局部麻醉技术,超声引导下锁骨下神经周围置管已被证明与锁骨上置管相比能提供更好的镇痛效果。经导管单次注射技术,即在开始输注前可说是“测试”导管的麻醉效果,已在锁骨下导管置管中得到验证,但在锁骨上导管置管中尚未得到验证。本研究调查了锁骨上导管的经导管单次注射技术,并检验了锁骨下导管能更快产生臂丛神经麻醉的假设。
术前,患者通过超声引导下非刺激置管技术随机分配接受锁骨上或锁骨下导管置管,术中经导管给予甲哌卡因单次注射,术后开始罗哌卡因神经周围输注。主要结局是在尺神经和正中神经分布区域达到完全感觉麻醉的时间。次要结局包括操作时间、与操作相关的疼痛和并发症,以及术后疼痛、阿片类药物消耗量、睡眠障碍和运动无力。
50例患者纳入本研究;除2根神经周围导管外,所有导管均按方案成功置入。锁骨上组和锁骨下组分别有21例(88%)和24例(100%)患者在30分钟内达到完全感觉麻醉(P = 0.088)。达到完全感觉麻醉的时间无差异。锁骨上组患者术后报告睡眠障碍更多,但在其他结局方面无统计学显著差异。
采用经导管单次注射技术的锁骨上和锁骨下神经周围导管均能提供有效的臂丛神经麻醉。