Suppr超能文献

中风后的体感评估与治疗:证据与实践的差距。

Somatosensory assessment and treatment after stroke: An evidence-practice gap.

作者信息

Pumpa Lloyd U, Cahill Liana S, Carey Leeanne M

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Apr;62(2):93-104. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12170. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Loss of body sensations is common after stroke, impacting negatively on recovery and performance of activities of daily living. Despite advances in the evidence for the assessment and treatment of somatosensory impairment post-stroke, the translation from research into clinical practice has been slow. The aim of this study was to determine current clinical practice of occupational therapists and physiotherapists in the assessment and treatment of somatosensory impairment post-stroke.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, self-administered online survey of occupational therapists and physiotherapists currently working with stroke clients in Australian health organisations, identified through an audit of stroke rehabilitation services and a professional member association.

RESULTS

172 clinicians, 62.8% occupational therapists and 37.2% physiotherapists currently working with stroke clients completed the survey. Most respondents (93.0%) indicated routinely assessing for sensory loss in stroke clients. The most commonly used measures were light touch and proprioception, with the majority (70.4%) not using standardised measures. Most respondents (97.7%) reported providing treatment to address sensory impairment, with compensatory strategies and sensory re-education the two most frequently reported. Evidence-based treatment choices were not common and therapists frequently relied on colleagues' opinions and previous experience to inform practice. Therapists commonly experienced barriers to implementing evidence-based sensory rehabilitation, including time constraints, large caseloads and lack of access to evidence-based somatosensory assessment and treatment resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Most therapists perceived somatosensory assessment and treatment as important. However, frequently utilised methods lack a sound theoretical or empirical basis. Despite published evidence regarding somatosensory assessment and treatment, an evidence-practice gap exists.

摘要

背景/目的:中风后身体感觉丧失很常见,对康复及日常生活活动能力产生负面影响。尽管中风后体感障碍的评估和治疗证据有所进展,但从研究到临床实践的转化却很缓慢。本研究的目的是确定职业治疗师和物理治疗师在中风后体感障碍评估和治疗方面的当前临床实践。

方法

通过对中风康复服务和专业会员协会的审核,对澳大利亚卫生机构中目前为中风患者提供服务的职业治疗师和物理治疗师进行了一项横断面、自我管理的在线调查。

结果

172名临床医生完成了调查,其中62.8%是职业治疗师,37.2%是物理治疗师,他们目前都在为中风患者提供服务。大多数受访者(93.0%)表示会定期评估中风患者的感觉丧失情况。最常用的评估方法是轻触觉和本体感觉,大多数(70.4%)没有使用标准化评估方法。大多数受访者(97.7%)报告称会针对感觉障碍进行治疗,其中补偿策略和感觉再教育是最常提及的两种。基于证据的治疗选择并不常见,治疗师经常依靠同事的意见和以往经验来指导实践。治疗师在实施基于证据的感觉康复时普遍遇到障碍,包括时间限制、工作量大以及缺乏基于证据的体感评估和治疗资源。

结论

大多数治疗师认为体感评估和治疗很重要。然而,常用方法缺乏坚实的理论或实证基础。尽管已有关于体感评估和治疗的证据发表,但仍存在证据与实践之间的差距。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验