Cahill Liana S, Carey Leeanne M, Mak-Yuen Yvonne, McCluskey Annie, Neilson Cheryl, O'Connor Denise A, Lannin Natasha A
Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Neurorehabilitation and Recovery, Stroke, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 19;11(2):e042879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042879.
Somatosensory loss is common after stroke with one-in-two individuals affected. Although clinical practice guidelines recommend providing somatosensory rehabilitation, this impairment often remains unassessed and untreated. To address the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, this study sought to understand the factors influencing delivery of evidence-based upper limb sensory rehabilitation after stroke.
Qualitative study involving focus groups and interviews. Data analysis used an inductive approach (thematic analysis) and deductive analysis using implementation theory (the Theoretical Domains Framework and Normalisation Process Theory).
Eight healthcare organisations in metropolitan and regional areas of Victoria and New South Wales, Australia.
Eighty-seven rehabilitation therapists (79% occupational therapists and 21% physiotherapists) were purposively sampled and participated in a knowledge translation study with staggered recruitment from 2014 to 2018.
Three types of factors influenced therapists' delivery of upper limb somatosensory rehabilitation: individual ('The uncertain, unskilled therapist'), patient ('Patient understanding and priorities) and organisational ('System pressures and resources). Deductive analysis using implementation theory identified key determinants of practice change, such as opportunities to consolidate new skills, the anticipated benefits of upskilling as a therapy team and the work anticipated by therapists to incorporate a new somatosensory rehabilitation approach.
Occupational therapists and physiotherapists hold valuable insights towards practice change in somatosensory rehabilitation from the 'frontline'. Therapists experience barriers to change including a lack of knowledge and skills, lack of resources and organisational pressures. Facilitators for change were identified, including social support and therapists' perceived legitimacy in using new somatosensory rehabilitation approaches. Results will inform the design of a tailored implementation strategy to increase the use of evidence-based somatosensory rehabilitation in Australia.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615000933550).
中风后体感丧失很常见,每两人中就有一人受影响。尽管临床实践指南建议提供体感康复,但这种损伤往往仍未得到评估和治疗。为了弥合指南建议与临床实践之间的差距,本研究旨在了解影响中风后循证上肢感觉康复实施的因素。
涉及焦点小组和访谈的定性研究。数据分析采用归纳法(主题分析)和运用实施理论的演绎分析(理论领域框架和规范化过程理论)。
澳大利亚维多利亚州和新南威尔士州大都市及地区的八个医疗保健机构。
八十七名康复治疗师(79%为职业治疗师,21%为物理治疗师)被 purposively 抽样,并参与了一项从2014年至2018年交错招募的知识转化研究。
三种类型的因素影响治疗师实施上肢体感康复:个人因素(“不确定、不熟练的治疗师”)、患者因素(“患者的理解和优先事项”)和组织因素(“系统压力和资源”)。运用实施理论的演绎分析确定了实践改变的关键决定因素,例如巩固新技能的机会、治疗团队提升技能的预期益处以及治疗师为纳入新的体感康复方法而预期开展的工作。
职业治疗师和物理治疗师对体感康复实践改变有着来自“一线”的宝贵见解。治疗师面临变革障碍,包括知识和技能不足、资源匮乏以及组织压力。确定了变革促进因素,包括社会支持以及治疗师在使用新的体感康复方法方面的感知合法性。研究结果将为制定量身定制的实施策略提供参考,以增加澳大利亚循证体感康复的使用。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12615000933550) 。 (注:purposively 未找到合适中文对应词,保留英文)